Banking on Power: Political Capitalism and Institutional Fragility in Iceland’s Banking System, 1885–2025

Iceland’s banking system has undergone repeated waves of reform: state-led development, party-based finance, liberalization, collapse, post-crisis reconstruction, and reprivatization. Drawing on Alþingi records, the report of the Special Investigation Commission, the National Audit Office’s review of the 2022 bank sale, and bank governance records, this article traces that history from 1885 to 2025 as an extreme case in which the interaction of institutions, elite networks, and legitimating frames becomes unusually visible. Combining Beckert’s triadic account of fields with Mahoney and Thelen’s modes of gradual institutional change, it shows that liberalization and privatization did not depoliticize finance but reallocated political influence to ownership structures, board appointments, and socially embedded credit relations. Reform was repeatedly absorbed rather than resisted. Only in the 2020s, under sustained external accountability, did that absorptive capacity meet its first genuine constraint. Political capitalism, the article argues, is a product of reform rather than an obstacle to it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Enterprise & Society
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2026.10166
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Banking on Power: Political Capitalism and Institutional Fragility in Iceland’s Banking System, 1885–2025

Catherine Batt
Enterprise & Society
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Banking on Power: Political Capitalism and Institutional Fragility in Iceland’s Banking System, 1885–2025

Catherine Batt
article en

Abstract

Iceland’s banking system has undergone repeated waves of reform: state-led development, party-based finance, liberalization, collapse, post-crisis reconstruction, and reprivatization. Drawing on Alþingi records, the report of the Special Investigation Commission, the National Audit Office’s review of the 2022 bank sale, and bank governance records, this article traces that history from 1885 to 2025 as an extreme case in which the interaction of institutions, elite networks, and legitimating frames becomes unusually visible. Combining Beckert’s triadic account of fields with Mahoney and Thelen’s modes of gradual institutional change, it shows that liberalization and privatization did not depoliticize finance but reallocated political influence to ownership structures, board appointments, and socially embedded credit relations. Reform was repeatedly absorbed rather than resisted. Only in the 2020s, under sustained external accountability, did that absorptive capacity meet its first genuine constraint. Political capitalism, the article argues, is a product of reform rather than an obstacle to it.

Enterprise & Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon