Pragmatic Evaluation of Effectiveness and Acceptability of the Bristol Medication Review Toolkit (BRISMED) Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial

Introduction Medicines are a key healthcare intervention. Medicines optimisation aims to ensure safe and effective use of medicines, with medication reviews a critical component. However, evidence around how reviews should be structured and delivered is limited. The Bristol Medication Review Toolkit comprises a review model and practical supporting materials to facilitate comprehensive, patient-centred, structured medication reviews. The BRISMED trial aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and acceptability of the Toolkit compared with standard general practice care. Methods BRISMED is a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial, with two parallel groups. General practices within the Oxford RCGP Research Surveillance Centre (RSC) network will be selected to participate, representing 500 primary care networks (PCNs) in England. Randomisation will occur at PCN level. The intervention will take place at the practice level, with no patient-level recruitment. Practices will either undertake usual care (control group, 250 PCNs) or receive the BRISMED Toolkit (intervention group, 250 PCNs) over the same 12-month intervention delivery period. The primary outcome will be potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), defined as the proportion of patients with ≥1 STOPP/START indicator at 12 months (binary outcome per patient). Secondary outcomes will include additional prescribing metrics and healthcare utilisation. Outcomes will be determined using routinely collected electronic health data. The primary analysis will use mixed-effects logistic regression, on an intention-to-treat basis. A parallel mixed-methods process evaluation in a subset of practices will examine intervention implementation and provide context for interpretation of the trial findings, alongside a cost consequence analysis. Findings will be disseminated through publications, conferences and stakeholder engagement. Patients and the public will contribute throughout the study, supporting research delivery and dissemination. Ethics and registration The study has received approval from the West of Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee 1 (reference 24/WS/0031). The trial is prospectively registered with ISRCTN (reference 12979016, registration date 3/6/2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14424.1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Evaluation of Effectiveness and Acceptability of the Bristol Medication Review Toolkit (BRISMED) Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial

Filipa Matos Ferreira, Abir Ghorayeb, Simon de Lusignan, Michael Andrew Lawton et al.
NIHR Open Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Pragmatic Evaluation of Effectiveness and Acceptability of the Bristol Medication Review Toolkit (BRISMED) Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial

Filipa Matos Ferreira, Abir Ghorayeb, Simon de Lusignan, Michael Andrew Lawton, Katrina M. Turner, Rupert Payne, William Hinton, Deborah McCahon, Leon Farmer, Graham Price, Patrick Moore, Bradley Barker-Jones, Hannah ER Evans
article en

Abstract

Introduction Medicines are a key healthcare intervention. Medicines optimisation aims to ensure safe and effective use of medicines, with medication reviews a critical component. However, evidence around how reviews should be structured and delivered is limited. The Bristol Medication Review Toolkit comprises a review model and practical supporting materials to facilitate comprehensive, patient-centred, structured medication reviews. The BRISMED trial aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and acceptability of the Toolkit compared with standard general practice care. Methods BRISMED is a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial, with two parallel groups. General practices within the Oxford RCGP Research Surveillance Centre (RSC) network will be selected to participate, representing 500 primary care networks (PCNs) in England. Randomisation will occur at PCN level. The intervention will take place at the practice level, with no patient-level recruitment. Practices will either undertake usual care (control group, 250 PCNs) or receive the BRISMED Toolkit (intervention group, 250 PCNs) over the same 12-month intervention delivery period. The primary outcome will be potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), defined as the proportion of patients with ≥1 STOPP/START indicator at 12 months (binary outcome per patient). Secondary outcomes will include additional prescribing metrics and healthcare utilisation. Outcomes will be determined using routinely collected electronic health data. The primary analysis will use mixed-effects logistic regression, on an intention-to-treat basis. A parallel mixed-methods process evaluation in a subset of practices will examine intervention implementation and provide context for interpretation of the trial findings, alongside a cost consequence analysis. Findings will be disseminated through publications, conferences and stakeholder engagement. Patients and the public will contribute throughout the study, supporting research delivery and dissemination. Ethics and registration The study has received approval from the West of Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee 1 (reference 24/WS/0031). The trial is prospectively registered with ISRCTN (reference 12979016, registration date 3/6/2024).

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
University of Exeter (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Office Of Health Economics (GB), Exeter Primary Care (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon