Scams and Malicious Links in WhatsApp Groups: Employment, Investment and Impersonation Fraud, Pix Payments in Brazil and Administrator-Level Controls

Groups on messaging platforms are a recurring stage in online fraud. Scammers add strangers to groups, post fraudulent offers in open groups, use groups to stage fake testimonials and move victims from one platform to another before asking for payment. This narrative review synthesises official documentation from WhatsApp and Meta, public service announcements from the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Europol's Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment, guidance from CERT.br and the Central Bank of Brazil, and peer-reviewed measurement research on public messaging groups. All sources were accessed and verified in October 2026. The review describes four scam families that official sources associate with messaging groups (employment and task scams, investment scams, impersonation scams and fake offers), the role of links in moving victims off the group, and the specific setting of Brazil, where instant Pix transfers are the usual payment rail and the Special Return Mechanism (MED) is the documented path for contesting fraudulent transfers. It then maps mitigations at three levels: platform features documented by WhatsApp (safety overview for unfamiliar groups, link restrictions for unknown contacts, scam warnings, reporting and group permissions), administrator practices, and automated group tooling such as link filtering, flood control and member approval. The review finds that official sources converge on a small set of warning signs, notably requests to pay in order to earn, urgency and links that move the conversation elsewhere, and that administrators can reduce exposure in the groups they control, but that no source measures the prevalence of scams inside WhatsApp groups. No original data are reported.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/cyp2g
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scams and Malicious Links in WhatsApp Groups: Employment, Investment and Impersonation Fraud, Pix Payments in Brazil and Administrator-Level Controls

Ivan Schroll
Open Science Framework
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
article

Scams and Malicious Links in WhatsApp Groups: Employment, Investment and Impersonation Fraud, Pix Payments in Brazil and Administrator-Level Controls

Ivan Schroll
article en

Abstract

Groups on messaging platforms are a recurring stage in online fraud. Scammers add strangers to groups, post fraudulent offers in open groups, use groups to stage fake testimonials and move victims from one platform to another before asking for payment. This narrative review synthesises official documentation from WhatsApp and Meta, public service announcements from the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Europol's Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment, guidance from CERT.br and the Central Bank of Brazil, and peer-reviewed measurement research on public messaging groups. All sources were accessed and verified in October 2026. The review describes four scam families that official sources associate with messaging groups (employment and task scams, investment scams, impersonation scams and fake offers), the role of links in moving victims off the group, and the specific setting of Brazil, where instant Pix transfers are the usual payment rail and the Special Return Mechanism (MED) is the documented path for contesting fraudulent transfers. It then maps mitigations at three levels: platform features documented by WhatsApp (safety overview for unfamiliar groups, link restrictions for unknown contacts, scam warnings, reporting and group permissions), administrator practices, and automated group tooling such as link filtering, flood control and member approval. The review finds that official sources converge on a small set of warning signs, notably requests to pay in order to earn, urgency and links that move the conversation elsewhere, and that administrators can reduce exposure in the groups they control, but that no source measures the prevalence of scams inside WhatsApp groups. No original data are reported.

Open Science Framework
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon