The Infrastructure Behind the Experiment: Rethinking Research Supply as a Shared Scientific Resource

Modern biomedical research depends on an extensive ecosystem of shared infrastructure that enables investigators to access specialized technologies, expertise, data resources, and biospecimens. Less attention has been given to the operational infrastructure that provides reliable access to the reagents and consumables required for everyday experimental work. Although traditionally viewed as an administrative or procurement function, research supply infrastructure directly influences the cost, timeliness, continuity, and sustainability of scientific activity. This article examines centralized research supply as a form of shared scientific infrastructure through the experience of the Genetic Resources Core Facility at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. What began as a small reagent-access program evolved into an institution-wide research supply infrastructure serving more than 5000 researchers and 846 principal investigators. In 2025, the program provided access to approximately 664,000 products and distributed more than 106,000 laboratory reagents while consolidating purchasing and distribution through a coordinated institutional framework. Over an eleven-year evaluation period, the model also generated substantial estimated institutional economic value through negotiated pricing, reduced shipping costs, and consolidation of purchasing activity. The experience demonstrates that the value of centralized research supply extends beyond procurement efficiency. Integration within a shared-resource environment can improve access to research materials, reduce administrative and logistical barriers, support continuity of experimental workflows, and connect purchasing decisions with scientific expertise and evolving research needs. These findings suggest that research supply can function as shared scientific infrastructure when organized around scientific access, integrated with the research ecosystem, and responsive to evolving investigator needs. Recognizing and strategically integrating this infrastructure within institutional research ecosystems provides an opportunity to strengthen scientific productivity, resilience, and long-term sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FASEB BioAdvances
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2026-00277
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Infrastructure Behind the Experiment: Rethinking Research Supply as a Shared Scientific Resource

Alan F. Scott, Melissa V. Olson, Keon W. Littrell, Kimberly A. Brown et al.
FASEB BioAdvances
Research, Science, and Academia
article

The Infrastructure Behind the Experiment: Rethinking Research Supply as a Shared Scientific Resource

Alan F. Scott, Melissa V. Olson, Keon W. Littrell, Kimberly A. Brown, Barbara A. Daily
article en

Abstract

Modern biomedical research depends on an extensive ecosystem of shared infrastructure that enables investigators to access specialized technologies, expertise, data resources, and biospecimens. Less attention has been given to the operational infrastructure that provides reliable access to the reagents and consumables required for everyday experimental work. Although traditionally viewed as an administrative or procurement function, research supply infrastructure directly influences the cost, timeliness, continuity, and sustainability of scientific activity. This article examines centralized research supply as a form of shared scientific infrastructure through the experience of the Genetic Resources Core Facility at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. What began as a small reagent-access program evolved into an institution-wide research supply infrastructure serving more than 5000 researchers and 846 principal investigators. In 2025, the program provided access to approximately 664,000 products and distributed more than 106,000 laboratory reagents while consolidating purchasing and distribution through a coordinated institutional framework. Over an eleven-year evaluation period, the model also generated substantial estimated institutional economic value through negotiated pricing, reduced shipping costs, and consolidation of purchasing activity. The experience demonstrates that the value of centralized research supply extends beyond procurement efficiency. Integration within a shared-resource environment can improve access to research materials, reduce administrative and logistical barriers, support continuity of experimental workflows, and connect purchasing decisions with scientific expertise and evolving research needs. These findings suggest that research supply can function as shared scientific infrastructure when organized around scientific access, integrated with the research ecosystem, and responsive to evolving investigator needs. Recognizing and strategically integrating this infrastructure within institutional research ecosystems provides an opportunity to strengthen scientific productivity, resilience, and long-term sustainability.

FASEB BioAdvancesVol. 8(11)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Johns Hopkins University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon