Oral versus vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation for endometrial dysbiosis: A paired pre and post–endometrial microbiome study

Infertility is a global health challenge, and impaired endometrial receptivity remains an important contributor to treatment failure. Endometrial dysbiosis, characterized by a low proportion of Lactobacillus in the endometrial microbiota, has been proposed as a potentially modifiable factor that may affect endometrial receptivity and fertility, and treatment with Lactobacillus-containing probiotics is emerging as a promising therapeutic approach. However, the optimal route of Lactobacillus supplementation remains unclear. We compared oral versus vaginal supplementation using the same Lactobacillus-containing formulation as an adjunct to standardized doxycycline/metronidazole therapy and continued oral lactoferrin in patients with baseline endometrial Lactobacillus <10%, based on paired microbiome profiling of endometrial samples (aspirated intrauterine fluid and endometrial tissue). In this single-center retrospective cohort study, thirty-two patients underwent paired endometrial microbiome testing before and after 30 days of supplementation (oral, n = 18; vaginal, n = 14). In the vaginal group, the median endometrial Lactobacillus proportion increased from 0.05% [0.00-0.20] to 99.15% [70.45-100.00] (p = 0.001), whereas in the oral group it increased from 0.00% [0.00-0.18] to 0.30% [0.03-66.33] (p = 0.005). The median change was greater with vaginal versus oral supplementation (+98.90% [70.45-99.80] vs + 0.25% [0.03-66.33], p < 0.001). Post-treatment Lactobacillus ≥80%, used as an exploratory marker of marked microbiota improvement, was observed in 9/14 patients (64%) in the vaginal group and 3/18 (17%) in the oral group (p = 0.010). Exploratory reproductive outcomes were limited by the small sample size and did not define a reliable clinical threshold. These findings suggest that, within this combined treatment regimen, vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation may provide a greater route-associated additional improvement in endometrial microbiota profiles than oral administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360619
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral versus vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation for endometrial dysbiosis: A paired pre and post–endometrial microbiome study

Miyuki Harada, Yasushi Hirota, Gentaro Izumi, Takehiro Hiraoka et al.
PLoS ONE
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Oral versus vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation for endometrial dysbiosis: A paired pre and post–endometrial microbiome study

Miyuki Harada, Yasushi Hirota, Gentaro Izumi, Takehiro Hiraoka, Daiki Hiratsuka, Mari Ichinose, Tomoko Makabe, Ayumi Iki, Motowo Nabeta, Mayu Kinoshita, Mitsunori Matsuo, Yumiko Doi, Okikaze Kato, Kotaro Oshima
article en

Abstract

Infertility is a global health challenge, and impaired endometrial receptivity remains an important contributor to treatment failure. Endometrial dysbiosis, characterized by a low proportion of Lactobacillus in the endometrial microbiota, has been proposed as a potentially modifiable factor that may affect endometrial receptivity and fertility, and treatment with Lactobacillus-containing probiotics is emerging as a promising therapeutic approach. However, the optimal route of Lactobacillus supplementation remains unclear. We compared oral versus vaginal supplementation using the same Lactobacillus-containing formulation as an adjunct to standardized doxycycline/metronidazole therapy and continued oral lactoferrin in patients with baseline endometrial Lactobacillus <10%, based on paired microbiome profiling of endometrial samples (aspirated intrauterine fluid and endometrial tissue). In this single-center retrospective cohort study, thirty-two patients underwent paired endometrial microbiome testing before and after 30 days of supplementation (oral, n = 18; vaginal, n = 14). In the vaginal group, the median endometrial Lactobacillus proportion increased from 0.05% [0.00-0.20] to 99.15% [70.45-100.00] (p = 0.001), whereas in the oral group it increased from 0.00% [0.00-0.18] to 0.30% [0.03-66.33] (p = 0.005). The median change was greater with vaginal versus oral supplementation (+98.90% [70.45-99.80] vs + 0.25% [0.03-66.33], p < 0.001). Post-treatment Lactobacillus ≥80%, used as an exploratory marker of marked microbiota improvement, was observed in 9/14 patients (64%) in the vaginal group and 3/18 (17%) in the oral group (p = 0.010). Exploratory reproductive outcomes were limited by the small sample size and did not define a reliable clinical threshold. These findings suggest that, within this combined treatment regimen, vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation may provide a greater route-associated additional improvement in endometrial microbiota profiles than oral administration.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Oral versus vaginal Lactobacillus supplementation for endometrial dysbiosis: A paired pre and post–endometrial microbiome study — Miyuki Harada, Yasushi Hirota, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS