Toward a conceptual framework of economic security for health research: a scoping review

Background Personal economic security, including stable income, employment, affordable housing, and protection against economic shocks, is fundamental to health. However, multiple and varied frameworks exist for defining or measuring economic security in health research and practice. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the economic (in)security literature published 2015–2025. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO for articles that defined or measured economic (in)security, or that examined the impact of economic (in)security on health-related outcomes. From 881 sources, 53 articles were reviewed. Definitions and methods of operationalizing economic security were extracted and coded based on thematic dimensions, domains, and sub-domains. Results There is wide variability in definitions and measurement of economic security. Economic security was defined multi-dimensionally across thematic domains, subjectivity and objectivity, and temporal dimensions (present versus future risk). Operationally, six domain areas of economic security were identified: income/finances, healthcare, employment, housing, food, and wealth/assets. Conclusions This six-domain framework of economic security for health research provides a foundation for more consistent measurement, improved intervention design, and specification of pathways linking economic conditions to health outcomes. Further investigation is needed to examine the framework's utility in elucidating economic security's multi-dimensional nature and devising measurement strategies to advance the science and practice of improving economic security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1887796
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a conceptual framework of economic security for health research: a scoping review

Kendra E. Pugh, Mayumi Okada Gianoli, Amanda K. Falcón, Brian J. Stevenson et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Toward a conceptual framework of economic security for health research: a scoping review

Kendra E. Pugh, Mayumi Okada Gianoli, Amanda K. Falcón, Brian J. Stevenson, James P. LePage, Jack Tsai, Marc I. Rosen, Bo Kim, Taylor Hunt
article en

Abstract

Background Personal economic security, including stable income, employment, affordable housing, and protection against economic shocks, is fundamental to health. However, multiple and varied frameworks exist for defining or measuring economic security in health research and practice. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the economic (in)security literature published 2015–2025. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO for articles that defined or measured economic (in)security, or that examined the impact of economic (in)security on health-related outcomes. From 881 sources, 53 articles were reviewed. Definitions and methods of operationalizing economic security were extracted and coded based on thematic dimensions, domains, and sub-domains. Results There is wide variability in definitions and measurement of economic security. Economic security was defined multi-dimensionally across thematic domains, subjectivity and objectivity, and temporal dimensions (present versus future risk). Operationally, six domain areas of economic security were identified: income/finances, healthcare, employment, housing, food, and wealth/assets. Conclusions This six-domain framework of economic security for health research provides a foundation for more consistent measurement, improved intervention design, and specification of pathways linking economic conditions to health outcomes. Further investigation is needed to examine the framework's utility in elucidating economic security's multi-dimensional nature and devising measurement strategies to advance the science and practice of improving economic security.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), Harvard University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), VA North Texas Health Care System (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon