Navigating the digital: university business model patterns and aligning digital transformation strategies

Purpose Digital transformation poses various challenges for universities, necessitating adjustments to business models and strategic positioning. We aim to identify university business model patterns and derive matching digital transformation strategy options, providing universities with a structured basis for aligning transformation efforts with their strategic orientation. Design/methodology/approach Based on an adapted Business Model Canvas for universities, we qualitatively analyze business model data collected from the 30 largest German universities. Data were structured into 59 subcategories across nine business model elements and analyzed through cross-case analysis in ten iterative workshops, combining quantitative and qualitative data to derive patterns and corresponding strategy options. Findings Five university business model patterns exist: three research-oriented (excellence, entrepreneurial and domain-specific) and two education-oriented (teacher training and education), including a distinct distance-learning subset. Research-oriented patterns show higher third-party and state funding and more research staff, while education-oriented patterns emphasize teaching scale. Matching Digital Transformation Strategy options were derived across four dimensions: technology use, value creation, structural change and financial aspects. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to German universities, which may influence the generalizability of the findings to other higher education contexts. Further research should examine our business model patterns in other countries and education systems. Practical implications Findings guide university management in aligning digital transformation strategies with their specific business model pattern rather than standardized approaches, requiring coordinated governance across research, teaching and administration. Social implications Findings suggest uniform funding and governance approaches may not reflect universities' heterogeneous orientations, calling for more differentiated, equitable higher education policy. Originality/value This study offers one of the first empirically derived typologies of university business models, systematically linking distinct patterns to matching digital transformation strategy options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Models
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jobm-07-2026-0022
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the digital: university business model patterns and aligning digital transformation strategies

Katharina Ebner, Alina Bockshecker, Stefan Smolnik
Journal of Business Models
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Navigating the digital: university business model patterns and aligning digital transformation strategies

Katharina Ebner, Alina Bockshecker, Stefan Smolnik
article en

Abstract

Purpose Digital transformation poses various challenges for universities, necessitating adjustments to business models and strategic positioning. We aim to identify university business model patterns and derive matching digital transformation strategy options, providing universities with a structured basis for aligning transformation efforts with their strategic orientation. Design/methodology/approach Based on an adapted Business Model Canvas for universities, we qualitatively analyze business model data collected from the 30 largest German universities. Data were structured into 59 subcategories across nine business model elements and analyzed through cross-case analysis in ten iterative workshops, combining quantitative and qualitative data to derive patterns and corresponding strategy options. Findings Five university business model patterns exist: three research-oriented (excellence, entrepreneurial and domain-specific) and two education-oriented (teacher training and education), including a distinct distance-learning subset. Research-oriented patterns show higher third-party and state funding and more research staff, while education-oriented patterns emphasize teaching scale. Matching Digital Transformation Strategy options were derived across four dimensions: technology use, value creation, structural change and financial aspects. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to German universities, which may influence the generalizability of the findings to other higher education contexts. Further research should examine our business model patterns in other countries and education systems. Practical implications Findings guide university management in aligning digital transformation strategies with their specific business model pattern rather than standardized approaches, requiring coordinated governance across research, teaching and administration. Social implications Findings suggest uniform funding and governance approaches may not reflect universities' heterogeneous orientations, calling for more differentiated, equitable higher education policy. Originality/value This study offers one of the first empirically derived typologies of university business models, systematically linking distinct patterns to matching digital transformation strategy options.

Journal of Business Models
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon