Hierarchical Neural Circuit Theory of Normalization and Inter-areal Communication

The primate brain exhibits a hierarchical, modular architecture with conserved microcircuits executing canonical computations across reciprocally connected cortical areas. We present a hierarchical neural circuit theory with feedback connections that dynamically implements divisive normalization across its hierarchy. In a two-stage instantiation (V1 ↔ V2), increasing feedback from V2 to V1 amplifies responses in both areas. We analytically derive power spectra (V1) and coherence spectra (V1-V2) as functions of frequency (f), and compare them with experimental observations: peaks in both spectra shift to higher frequencies with increased stimulus contrast, and power decays as 1/f4 at high frequencies. The closed-form spectra are validated against direct stochastic simulation of the full nonlinear circuit across contrasts. The theory further predicts distinctive spectral signatures of feedback and input gain modulation. Crucially, the theory offers a unified view of inter-areal communication, defined as the ability to linearly predict neural activity in one brain area from neural activity in another, with emergent features consistent with empirical observations of both communication subspaces and inter-areal coherence. It admits a low-dimensional communication subspace, where inter-areal communication is lower-dimensional than within-area communication. It further predicts that: i) increasing feedback strength enhances inter-areal communication and diminishes within-area communication, without altering the subspace dimensionality; ii) communication is strongest, and the subspace dimensionality lowest, at the frequencies at which V1-V2 coherence peaks; iii) normalization reduces the subspace dimensionality. Finally, a three-area (V1 ↔ V4 and V1 ↔ V5) instantiation of the theory demonstrates that differential feedback from higher to lower cortical areas dictates their dynamic functional connectivity. Altogether, our theory provides a robust and analytically tractable framework for generating experimentally-testable predictions about normalization, inter-areal communication, and functional connectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.111297.2
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Hierarchical Neural Circuit Theory of Normalization and Inter-areal Communication

Stefano Martiniani, Shivang Rawat, Achintya Pal, David J. Heeger
eLife
Neural dynamics and brain function
preprint

Hierarchical Neural Circuit Theory of Normalization and Inter-areal Communication

Stefano Martiniani, Shivang Rawat, Achintya Pal, David J. Heeger
preprint en

Abstract

The primate brain exhibits a hierarchical, modular architecture with conserved microcircuits executing canonical computations across reciprocally connected cortical areas. We present a hierarchical neural circuit theory with feedback connections that dynamically implements divisive normalization across its hierarchy. In a two-stage instantiation (V1 ↔ V2), increasing feedback from V2 to V1 amplifies responses in both areas. We analytically derive power spectra (V1) and coherence spectra (V1-V2) as functions of frequency (f), and compare them with experimental observations: peaks in both spectra shift to higher frequencies with increased stimulus contrast, and power decays as 1/f4 at high frequencies. The closed-form spectra are validated against direct stochastic simulation of the full nonlinear circuit across contrasts. The theory further predicts distinctive spectral signatures of feedback and input gain modulation. Crucially, the theory offers a unified view of inter-areal communication, defined as the ability to linearly predict neural activity in one brain area from neural activity in another, with emergent features consistent with empirical observations of both communication subspaces and inter-areal coherence. It admits a low-dimensional communication subspace, where inter-areal communication is lower-dimensional than within-area communication. It further predicts that: i) increasing feedback strength enhances inter-areal communication and diminishes within-area communication, without altering the subspace dimensionality; ii) communication is strongest, and the subspace dimensionality lowest, at the frequencies at which V1-V2 coherence peaks; iii) normalization reduces the subspace dimensionality. Finally, a three-area (V1 ↔ V4 and V1 ↔ V5) instantiation of the theory demonstrates that differential feedback from higher to lower cortical areas dictates their dynamic functional connectivity. Altogether, our theory provides a robust and analytically tractable framework for generating experimentally-testable predictions about normalization, inter-areal communication, and functional connectivity.

eLife
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US), Simons Foundation (US), New York University (US)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, Aspen Center for Physics, National Institutes of Health
Neural dynamics and brain function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon