Multi-Scale Screening of Diesel Surrogate Mechanisms for Combustion, NOx, and Late-Cycle Species in a Methanol–Diesel Marine Engine

Methanol is a promising low-carbon fuel for large marine engines, but reliable simulation of methanol–diesel combustion depends on selecting diesel-surrogate chemistry that remains credible for both ignition and emissions. Four diesel-surrogate mechanisms were therefore assessed through engine-scale CFD validation and controlled homogeneous-reactor calculations before application to a low-speed two-stroke marine engine. At the diesel-only full-load validation point, all four mechanisms reproduced the measured pressure history, although their combustion-phasing, fuel-consumption, and NOx predictions differed. LLNL 3.0 gave the closest peak pressure and CA50, whereas the Pei mechanism provided the most balanced agreement across pressure, phasing, fuel consumption, and NOx. Closed adiabatic constant-volume calculations at 960 K, 160 bar, and φ = 1.0 revealed substantial differences in ignition delay and radical evolution, confirming that similar engine pressure traces can conceal distinct intrinsic kinetic responses. Pei was consequently applied to cases with 0%, 50%, 75%, and 90% methanol energy substitution at the baseline full-load boundary conditions. As only the diesel-only condition was experimentally validated, the substitution results represent relative model predictions rather than validated absolute values. Relative to diesel-only operation, 50% substitution advanced CA50 by 5.02 °CA, increased indicated thermal efficiency from 48.4% to 52.3%, and increased predicted NOx by 92.5%. At higher substitution, this response weakened: the 90% case returned CA50 and NOx close to the diesel baseline and strongly reduced CO, whereas predicted unburned methanol and formaldehyde reached their maxima at 75% substitution. These results show that mechanism screening is essential before interpreting methanol-substitution effects and reveal an efficiency–NOx–incomplete-oxidation trade-off under the modeled full-load condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17111051
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Scale Screening of Diesel Surrogate Mechanisms for Combustion, NOx, and Late-Cycle Species in a Methanol–Diesel Marine Engine

Chang Zhai, 黄魏迪, Yuxin Sun, Zhiyuan Cai et al.
Atmosphere
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Multi-Scale Screening of Diesel Surrogate Mechanisms for Combustion, NOx, and Late-Cycle Species in a Methanol–Diesel Marine Engine

Chang Zhai, 黄魏迪, Yuxin Sun, Zhiyuan Cai, Weifang Man, Jie Wu, Shenqi Zhang, Tao Li, Zheng Mao
article en

Abstract

Methanol is a promising low-carbon fuel for large marine engines, but reliable simulation of methanol–diesel combustion depends on selecting diesel-surrogate chemistry that remains credible for both ignition and emissions. Four diesel-surrogate mechanisms were therefore assessed through engine-scale CFD validation and controlled homogeneous-reactor calculations before application to a low-speed two-stroke marine engine. At the diesel-only full-load validation point, all four mechanisms reproduced the measured pressure history, although their combustion-phasing, fuel-consumption, and NOx predictions differed. LLNL 3.0 gave the closest peak pressure and CA50, whereas the Pei mechanism provided the most balanced agreement across pressure, phasing, fuel consumption, and NOx. Closed adiabatic constant-volume calculations at 960 K, 160 bar, and φ = 1.0 revealed substantial differences in ignition delay and radical evolution, confirming that similar engine pressure traces can conceal distinct intrinsic kinetic responses. Pei was consequently applied to cases with 0%, 50%, 75%, and 90% methanol energy substitution at the baseline full-load boundary conditions. As only the diesel-only condition was experimentally validated, the substitution results represent relative model predictions rather than validated absolute values. Relative to diesel-only operation, 50% substitution advanced CA50 by 5.02 °CA, increased indicated thermal efficiency from 48.4% to 52.3%, and increased predicted NOx by 92.5%. At higher substitution, this response weakened: the 90% case returned CA50 and NOx close to the diesel baseline and strongly reduced CO, whereas predicted unburned methanol and formaldehyde reached their maxima at 75% substitution. These results show that mechanism screening is essential before interpreting methanol-substitution effects and reveal an efficiency–NOx–incomplete-oxidation trade-off under the modeled full-load condition.

AtmosphereVol. 17(11)
Harbin Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon