Paper 175B Testing BAO Structure: Reconstruction, Controls, and Uncertainty

A previously developed full-covariance template and projection framework is now used in arecorded matched-window BOSS DR12 comparison, with its actual power measurements, surveywindow, wide-angle response, covariance and calibration–validation split. The pilot chooses amongtwo conditional phase-impulse response families on NGC z1; nonnegative fitted event amplitudes anda measured-space smooth nuisance design are treated separately. Although one searched calibrationscore is large relative to its prescribed Gaussian reference, the smooth-only mean is inadequate andthe frozen SGC z3 validation does not distinguish the oscillatory shapes from dephased envelopes.These results are therefore an executed conditional comparison, not an independent prediction orevidence for an actual Holosphere baryon mechanism. The newly calculated continuously coupledsource produces a different waveform, and must receive a fresh physically specified observationmapping before any later inference. Complete baseline statistical checks and their reproducibilityconventions are retained. An additional offline three-point readiness control tests a conditional nativephase-sign distinction; no new astronomical bispectrum is fitted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23666441
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paper 175B Testing BAO Structure: Reconstruction, Controls, and Uncertainty

Michael Sarnowski
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Paper 175B Testing BAO Structure: Reconstruction, Controls, and Uncertainty

Michael Sarnowski
article en

Abstract

A previously developed full-covariance template and projection framework is now used in arecorded matched-window BOSS DR12 comparison, with its actual power measurements, surveywindow, wide-angle response, covariance and calibration–validation split. The pilot chooses amongtwo conditional phase-impulse response families on NGC z1; nonnegative fitted event amplitudes anda measured-space smooth nuisance design are treated separately. Although one searched calibrationscore is large relative to its prescribed Gaussian reference, the smooth-only mean is inadequate andthe frozen SGC z3 validation does not distinguish the oscillatory shapes from dephased envelopes.These results are therefore an executed conditional comparison, not an independent prediction orevidence for an actual Holosphere baryon mechanism. The newly calculated continuously coupledsource produces a different waveform, and must receive a fresh physically specified observationmapping before any later inference. Complete baseline statistical checks and their reproducibilityconventions are retained. An additional offline three-point readiness control tests a conditional nativephase-sign distinction; no new astronomical bispectrum is fitted.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon