Health Systems Preparedness for Outbreak Response: A Systematic Review

Background: Outbreak response depends on health-system capacities that extend beyond formal planning, including surveillance, coordination, staff readiness, supplies and community trust. Evidence about measured preparedness and real-world response is dispersed across different designs. Objective: To evaluate reported health-system preparedness for infectious-disease outbreaks, identify recurrent operational gaps and assess whether preparedness scores correspond with response performance. Methods: We screened a bounded, fully enumerated set of openly accessible publisher, PubMed and PubMed Central records for primary studies published between 1 January 2000–13 August 2026. Source verification was completed on 14 August 2026. One reviewer inspected accessible original reports, extracted source-located findings and assessed design limitations. Findings were grouped thematically without statistical pooling. Results: The verifiable record set contained 30 accessed record entries, including 7 secondary publication-metadata records. After duplicate removal, 23 unique reports were screened; 2 were excluded initially and 3 after full-text assessment. Eighteen studies were included. Facility studies identified gaps in budgets, personal protective equipment, training and simulation. Surveillance rebuilding improved reporting coverage, although some response timeliness indicators declined. Country-level preparedness scores did not reliably predict observed outbreak response or COVID-19 burden; higher scores were associated with greater reported case/death data completeness in one ecological study. Conclusions: Preparedness appears multidimensional, context dependent and imperfectly captured by national indices. The evidence supports operational assessment, practical drills, integrated surveillance and coordinated response planning, but largely observational designs do not establish causal effects. The open-source verification set is not a complete export of all relevant bibliographic databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijtdh/2026/v47i101789
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Systems Preparedness for Outbreak Response: A Systematic Review

Best Ordinioha, Emmanuel Etim Clement, Daniel Okon, Tariebi Katherine Owei-Tongu et al.
International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health
Disaster Response and Management
article

Health Systems Preparedness for Outbreak Response: A Systematic Review

Best Ordinioha, Emmanuel Etim Clement, Daniel Okon, Tariebi Katherine Owei-Tongu, Okongko Aniefiok Dickson, Samuel Soni Ejekwu, Chinenye Okafor
article en

Abstract

Background: Outbreak response depends on health-system capacities that extend beyond formal planning, including surveillance, coordination, staff readiness, supplies and community trust. Evidence about measured preparedness and real-world response is dispersed across different designs. Objective: To evaluate reported health-system preparedness for infectious-disease outbreaks, identify recurrent operational gaps and assess whether preparedness scores correspond with response performance. Methods: We screened a bounded, fully enumerated set of openly accessible publisher, PubMed and PubMed Central records for primary studies published between 1 January 2000–13 August 2026. Source verification was completed on 14 August 2026. One reviewer inspected accessible original reports, extracted source-located findings and assessed design limitations. Findings were grouped thematically without statistical pooling. Results: The verifiable record set contained 30 accessed record entries, including 7 secondary publication-metadata records. After duplicate removal, 23 unique reports were screened; 2 were excluded initially and 3 after full-text assessment. Eighteen studies were included. Facility studies identified gaps in budgets, personal protective equipment, training and simulation. Surveillance rebuilding improved reporting coverage, although some response timeliness indicators declined. Country-level preparedness scores did not reliably predict observed outbreak response or COVID-19 burden; higher scores were associated with greater reported case/death data completeness in one ecological study. Conclusions: Preparedness appears multidimensional, context dependent and imperfectly captured by national indices. The evidence supports operational assessment, practical drills, integrated surveillance and coordinated response planning, but largely observational designs do not establish causal effects. The open-source verification set is not a complete export of all relevant bibliographic databases.

International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & HealthVol. 47(10)
University of Port Harcourt (NG), Federal University Otuoke (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon