IMPROVING JOB SEEKERS' DECISION-MAKING MECHANISMS IN THE LABOR MARKET BASED ON BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

This article investigates the role of behavioral economics in improving job seekers' decision-making mechanisms in the labor market. Traditional labor market theories assume that individuals make employment decisions by rationally comparing expected wages, working conditions, employment opportunities, and job-search costs. However, actual labor market behavior is also influenced by psychological biases, risk preferences, social expectations, and information asymmetry. The objective of this study is to identify the principal behavioral determinants affecting employment decisions and propose an institutional framework for improving job-search efficiency through behavioral interventions and recruitment agencies. The research applies theoretical analysis, comparative assessment, systematic classification, and conceptual modeling. Particular attention is paid to loss aversion, present bias, reference-dependent preferences, overconfidence, and trust in labor market intermediaries. The article argues that integrating behavioral insights into employment services may improve information transparency, support realistic wage expectations, and facilitate better matching between job seekers and employers. A conceptual mechanism connecting behavioral factors, recruitment services, and employment outcomes is proposed. The study concludes that behavioral approaches can complement traditional labor market policies and contribute to the development of more inclusive and efficient employment institutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23672609
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPROVING JOB SEEKERS' DECISION-MAKING MECHANISMS IN THE LABOR MARKET BASED ON BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

Hikmatullaev Ahmadjon Habibulla ugli
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

IMPROVING JOB SEEKERS' DECISION-MAKING MECHANISMS IN THE LABOR MARKET BASED ON BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

Hikmatullaev Ahmadjon Habibulla ugli
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the role of behavioral economics in improving job seekers' decision-making mechanisms in the labor market. Traditional labor market theories assume that individuals make employment decisions by rationally comparing expected wages, working conditions, employment opportunities, and job-search costs. However, actual labor market behavior is also influenced by psychological biases, risk preferences, social expectations, and information asymmetry. The objective of this study is to identify the principal behavioral determinants affecting employment decisions and propose an institutional framework for improving job-search efficiency through behavioral interventions and recruitment agencies. The research applies theoretical analysis, comparative assessment, systematic classification, and conceptual modeling. Particular attention is paid to loss aversion, present bias, reference-dependent preferences, overconfidence, and trust in labor market intermediaries. The article argues that integrating behavioral insights into employment services may improve information transparency, support realistic wage expectations, and facilitate better matching between job seekers and employers. A conceptual mechanism connecting behavioral factors, recruitment services, and employment outcomes is proposed. The study concludes that behavioral approaches can complement traditional labor market policies and contribute to the development of more inclusive and efficient employment institutions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon