Christian Realism and American Power

In a world where some men have chosen to be monsters, Christian realism navigates between utopian idealism and cynical realpolitik, taking seriously both human nature and the demands of political responsibility without giving up on ethics. This essay sets out the structure of that tradition as an ethic of responsibility for the use of American power. Using Reinhold Niebuhr's “Serenity Prayer” as a frame, it traces a theological logic of creation, fall, restoration, and eschatological hope. Drawing on Augustine, Aquinas, Martin Luther, Paul Ramsey, Jean Bethke Elshtain, and Nigel Biggar, it positions the just war tradition as a moral enterprise grounded in a sovereign's responsibility for the maintenance of order, justice, and peace. On this account, the deontological criteria tell us when force is obligatory, not merely when it is permissible. When the prudential criteria counsel restraint, that restraint should register as a tragedy. As a palliative to that eventuality, the essay concludes with a reflection on future hope.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Christian Ethics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468261500056
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Christian Realism and American Power

Marc LiVecche
1 links
Studies in Christian Ethics
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

Christian Realism and American Power

Marc LiVecche
article en

Abstract

In a world where some men have chosen to be monsters, Christian realism navigates between utopian idealism and cynical realpolitik, taking seriously both human nature and the demands of political responsibility without giving up on ethics. This essay sets out the structure of that tradition as an ethic of responsibility for the use of American power. Using Reinhold Niebuhr's “Serenity Prayer” as a frame, it traces a theological logic of creation, fall, restoration, and eschatological hope. Drawing on Augustine, Aquinas, Martin Luther, Paul Ramsey, Jean Bethke Elshtain, and Nigel Biggar, it positions the just war tradition as a moral enterprise grounded in a sovereign's responsibility for the maintenance of order, justice, and peace. On this account, the deontological criteria tell us when force is obligatory, not merely when it is permissible. When the prudential criteria counsel restraint, that restraint should register as a tragedy. As a palliative to that eventuality, the essay concludes with a reflection on future hope.

Studies in Christian Ethics
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon