Artificial Intelligence and Constitutional Rights in India: Regulating Algorithmic Decision-Making, Bias and Accountability

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into policing, welfare administration, employment, credit, education, healthcare, judicial and legal systems, and public administration. Algorithmic systems may improve efficiency, consistency and the processing of large quantities of information, but they may also reproduce or amplify discriminatory patterns embedded in historical data and institutional practices. Where governmental decisions affecting individuals are informed or generated by algorithms, constitutional concerns arise regarding equality, non-discrimination, privacy, dignity, autonomy, freedom, procedural fairness and access to remedies. India does not presently possess a single comprehensive AI-specific constitutional accountability framework. Nevertheless, Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution, together with administrative-law principles and the emerging data-protection and responsible-AI framework, provide a substantial foundation for regulating rights-affecting AI. This paper argues for a rights-based, risk-sensitive Indian framework incorporating algorithmic impact assessment, transparency, meaningful explanation, human oversight, independent auditing, institutional accountability and effective remedies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23662573
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Constitutional Rights in India: Regulating Algorithmic Decision-Making, Bias and Accountability

J . SATHVIKA
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and Constitutional Rights in India: Regulating Algorithmic Decision-Making, Bias and Accountability

J . SATHVIKA
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into policing, welfare administration, employment, credit, education, healthcare, judicial and legal systems, and public administration. Algorithmic systems may improve efficiency, consistency and the processing of large quantities of information, but they may also reproduce or amplify discriminatory patterns embedded in historical data and institutional practices. Where governmental decisions affecting individuals are informed or generated by algorithms, constitutional concerns arise regarding equality, non-discrimination, privacy, dignity, autonomy, freedom, procedural fairness and access to remedies. India does not presently possess a single comprehensive AI-specific constitutional accountability framework. Nevertheless, Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution, together with administrative-law principles and the emerging data-protection and responsible-AI framework, provide a substantial foundation for regulating rights-affecting AI. This paper argues for a rights-based, risk-sensitive Indian framework incorporating algorithmic impact assessment, transparency, meaningful explanation, human oversight, independent auditing, institutional accountability and effective remedies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon