Comparative analysis of end-to-end learning and foundation models for clinical-grade prostate pathology

Abstract Foundation models (FMs) using self-supervised pre-training are widely advocated as a universal solution for pathology, yet their advantages over task-specific (TS) models remain unclear. Here we show, using over 100,000 prostate biopsies from 6268 patients across 15 sites, that while FMs demonstrate utility in data-scarce scenarios, their performance converges with—and is in some cases surpassed by—TS models with sufficient labeled training data. Concordance with pathologists’ grading reaches quadratic Cohen’s kappas of 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92; all models) on internal and 0.87 (0.86-0.88; TS), 0.86 (0.84-0.87; UNI FM) and 0.85 (0.84-0.86; Virchow2 FM) on external cohorts at full training. Task-specific training markedly reduces misgrading, misdiagnosis of challenging morphologies, and technical variability. Notably, FMs consume up to 35 times more energy. We advocate for considering both FMs and end-to-end learning for robust, resource-efficient, and clinically applicable AI pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78996-7
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of end-to-end learning and foundation models for clinical-grade prostate pathology

Emiel A. M. Janssen, Kristina Hotakainen, Roman Łowicki, J. Asenjo et al.
Nature Communications
AI in cancer detection
article

Comparative analysis of end-to-end learning and foundation models for clinical-grade prostate pathology

Emiel A. M. Janssen, Kristina Hotakainen, Roman Łowicki, J. Asenjo, Einar G. Gudlaugsson, Radzisław Kordek, Svein Reidar Kjosavik, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Nita Mulliqi, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Henrik Olsson, Marcin Braun, Paolo Libretti, Sol Erika Boman, Kimmo Kartasalo, Kelvin Szolnoky, Masi Valkonen, Martin Eklund, Päivi O. Väre, Lars Egevad, Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Anders Blilie, Geraldine Martinez Gonzalez, Benedicte Parm Ulhøi, Matteo Titus, Marcello Gambacorta, Julia Anna Mielcarz, Brett Delahunt, Hemamali Samaratunga, Xiaoyi Ji
article en

Abstract

Abstract Foundation models (FMs) using self-supervised pre-training are widely advocated as a universal solution for pathology, yet their advantages over task-specific (TS) models remain unclear. Here we show, using over 100,000 prostate biopsies from 6268 patients across 15 sites, that while FMs demonstrate utility in data-scarce scenarios, their performance converges with—and is in some cases surpassed by—TS models with sufficient labeled training data. Concordance with pathologists’ grading reaches quadratic Cohen’s kappas of 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92; all models) on internal and 0.87 (0.86-0.88; TS), 0.86 (0.84-0.87; UNI FM) and 0.85 (0.84-0.86; Virchow2 FM) on external cohorts at full training. Task-specific training markedly reduces misgrading, misdiagnosis of challenging morphologies, and technical variability. Notably, FMs consume up to 35 times more energy. We advocate for considering both FMs and end-to-end learning for robust, resource-efficient, and clinically applicable AI pathology.

Nature Communications
Griffith University (AU), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), The University of Queensland (AU), Aichi Medical University (JP), Tampere University (FI), Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (NZ), Aarhus University (DK), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), Science for Life Laboratory (SE), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Länsi-Pohjan Sairaanhoitopiirin Kuntayhtymä (FI), Aichi Medical University Hospital (JP), SDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare (IT), Medical University of Lodz (PL), University of Tampere (FI), University of Bergen (NO), University of Stavanger (NO)
KAUTE-Säätiö, Innovationsfonden, Cancerfonden, Karolinska Institutet, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, China Scholarship Council, NordForsk, Orionin Tutkimussäätiö, Instrumentariumin Tiedesäätiö, Science for Life Laboratory, David och Astrid Hageléns Stiftelse, Syöpäsäätiö, Business Finland, National Supercomputer Centre, Linköpings Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon