Hippocampal replay repairs the cognitive map for flexible planning

Hippocampal replay is highly structured: prospective replay precedes retrospective replay within a stopping period, each aligns with the animal's future and past paths, with replay sometimes being directed towards goals the animal has abandoned. These regularities have resisted a single explanation. Replay seems sometimes to serve the animal's next decision and sometimes to work against it, and its prospective-then-retrospective ordering, present even in animals with little experience, runs opposite to what the leading normative account predicts. We propose that replay repairs the cognitive map. A map that supports planning must already be built around where the animal is going since that is where its plans end. Every change of goal leaves the map wrong in a specific way and in need of two corrections: one for the goal being adopted and another for the goal being left behind. Their relative size and reach account for replay's ordering, its direction, and its apparently paradoxical content. The account also makes a prediction about a specific condition, when the animal's past and future paths converge, under which the usual ordering should invert and this is confirmed from recordings of rats foraging in an open arena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.20.760493
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Hippocampal replay repairs the cognitive map for flexible planning

Armin Bazarjani, Caitlin S. Mallory, Payam Piray, David Foster
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
preprint

Hippocampal replay repairs the cognitive map for flexible planning

Armin Bazarjani, Caitlin S. Mallory, Payam Piray, David Foster
preprint en

Abstract

Hippocampal replay is highly structured: prospective replay precedes retrospective replay within a stopping period, each aligns with the animal's future and past paths, with replay sometimes being directed towards goals the animal has abandoned. These regularities have resisted a single explanation. Replay seems sometimes to serve the animal's next decision and sometimes to work against it, and its prospective-then-retrospective ordering, present even in animals with little experience, runs opposite to what the leading normative account predicts. We propose that replay repairs the cognitive map. A map that supports planning must already be built around where the animal is going since that is where its plans end. Every change of goal leaves the map wrong in a specific way and in need of two corrections: one for the goal being adopted and another for the goal being left behind. Their relative size and reach account for replay's ordering, its direction, and its apparently paradoxical content. The account also makes a prediction about a specific condition, when the animal's past and future paths converge, under which the usual ordering should invert and this is confirmed from recordings of rats foraging in an open arena.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Southern California (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon