Development and evaluation of a blood transfusion prediction algorithm tailored for precision and utility in civilian and military trauma patients

Early decisions regarding blood transfusion in trauma are time-critical and made under substantial uncertainty. Existing prediction models typically classify patients using fixed thresholds and do not estimate the volume or timing of transfusion. This limits their utility for real-time clinical decision-making and resource planning. We developed and validated a Bayesian network model, informed by domain knowledge and clinical data, to predict transfusion requirements in trauma using injury and physiological variables available early after injury. The model estimates transfusion volume across multiple timeframes (2, 6, 12, and 24 h). It was developed using data from a prospective civilian cohort and military trauma registries ( n = 2361) and evaluated using internal cross-validation and external validation in an independent dataset ( n = 13,347). The model achieved AUROC values of 0·82–0·94 for binary outcomes across timeframes. For ordinal volume predictions, Ranked Probability Scores were 0·07 for 0–12 h predictions and 0·04 for 12–24 h predictions. In scenario-based evaluation, agreement with model predictions was observed in 213 of 225 (95%) expert assessments. Prediction models based on binary thresholds may have limited impact on clinical decision-making despite good performance. A decision-support approach that estimates transfusion requirements by volume and timing, using early-available clinical data, may provide more clinically useful decision support in trauma care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06389-9
Primary Topic
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and evaluation of a blood transfusion prediction algorithm tailored for precision and utility in civilian and military trauma patients

Max E. R. Marsden, Evangelia Kyrimi, Nigel R.M. Tai, Sankalp Tandle et al.
Critical Care
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
article

Development and evaluation of a blood transfusion prediction algorithm tailored for precision and utility in civilian and military trauma patients

Max E. R. Marsden, Evangelia Kyrimi, Nigel R.M. Tai, Sankalp Tandle, Zane Perkins, Jared M. Wohlgemut, Jennifer Margaret Gurney, Erhan Pisirir, Karim Brohi, Rebecca S. Stoner, Tom Woolley, D. William Marsh, Giles Goatly
article en

Abstract

Early decisions regarding blood transfusion in trauma are time-critical and made under substantial uncertainty. Existing prediction models typically classify patients using fixed thresholds and do not estimate the volume or timing of transfusion. This limits their utility for real-time clinical decision-making and resource planning. We developed and validated a Bayesian network model, informed by domain knowledge and clinical data, to predict transfusion requirements in trauma using injury and physiological variables available early after injury. The model estimates transfusion volume across multiple timeframes (2, 6, 12, and 24 h). It was developed using data from a prospective civilian cohort and military trauma registries ( n = 2361) and evaluated using internal cross-validation and external validation in an independent dataset ( n = 13,347). The model achieved AUROC values of 0·82–0·94 for binary outcomes across timeframes. For ordinal volume predictions, Ranked Probability Scores were 0·07 for 0–12 h predictions and 0·04 for 12–24 h predictions. In scenario-based evaluation, agreement with model predictions was observed in 213 of 225 (95%) expert assessments. Prediction models based on binary thresholds may have limited impact on clinical decision-making despite good performance. A decision-support approach that estimates transfusion requirements by volume and timing, using early-available clinical data, may provide more clinically useful decision support in trauma care.

Critical Care
United States Department of Defense (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Defense Health Agency (US), Blizard Institute (GB)
U.S. Department of Defense, ZOLL Medical Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon