How i do it: a survey of practice patterns in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Despite the global availability and utilization of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), it remains a technically complex operation, with wide variation in training paradigms, surgical technique, and perioperative management. This study examines international RARP practices and aims to identify trends and gaps in clinical practice. A multiple-choice questionnaire consisting of 32 questions was distributed between January and July 2023. A total of 102 responses were received. Responses with ≥ 5 questions with missing data (n = 8) were excluded. Among 94 participants, 91.5% were male, 69.1% practiced outside the United States (US), and 72.3% were fellowship-trained. Most surgeons (79.8%) reported performing ≥ 3 RARPs monthly. About 75% of surgeons reported performing ≥ 90% of their radical prostatectomies (RP) robotically. Seven (7.45%) respondents who reported performing RPs only via laparoscopic or open approach were excluded from subsequent analyses. Regarding the surgical technique, transperitoneal anterior approach was the most preferred (62.1%). For nerve-sparing, the combined antegrade-retrograde approach (43.7%) and the antegrade-only approaches (36.8%) were most common. Approximately half of respondents (51.7%) preferred cut-and-suture ligation for dorsal venous complex control. For pelvic lymph node dissection, standard (44.8%) or limited (29.9%) templates were preferred over the extended (24.1%) template. The most common method for vascular control was clips for vascular pedicle ligation (79.3%). Of the continence-preserving techniques, most respondents agreed on the importance of maximal urethral length preservation (93.1%), bladder neck preservation (80.5%), and posterior reconstruction (64.4%). Postoperatively, most surgeons endorsed early mobilization (92%), early oral nutrition (85.1%), and non-opioid oral analgesia (57.5%). All US-based surgeons reported discharging ≥ 70% of patients on postoperative day 1, whereas discharge patterns varied among non-US surgeons. There are significant global variations in the practice of RARP. These findings point to the potential utility of consensus-driven, evidence-based guidelines to optimize RARP practices worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04080-3
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How i do it: a survey of practice patterns in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Johnny Wang, Narmina Khanmammadova, Jacob Basilius, Kristene Myklak et al.
2 links
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

How i do it: a survey of practice patterns in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Johnny Wang, Narmina Khanmammadova, Jacob Basilius, Kristene Myklak, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Dat Tien Nguyen, Daniel Jiang, Sohrab N. Ali, David I. Lee, Mohammad Abubakr, Mohammed Shahait, Jade Vanta
article en

Abstract

Despite the global availability and utilization of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), it remains a technically complex operation, with wide variation in training paradigms, surgical technique, and perioperative management. This study examines international RARP practices and aims to identify trends and gaps in clinical practice. A multiple-choice questionnaire consisting of 32 questions was distributed between January and July 2023. A total of 102 responses were received. Responses with ≥ 5 questions with missing data (n = 8) were excluded. Among 94 participants, 91.5% were male, 69.1% practiced outside the United States (US), and 72.3% were fellowship-trained. Most surgeons (79.8%) reported performing ≥ 3 RARPs monthly. About 75% of surgeons reported performing ≥ 90% of their radical prostatectomies (RP) robotically. Seven (7.45%) respondents who reported performing RPs only via laparoscopic or open approach were excluded from subsequent analyses. Regarding the surgical technique, transperitoneal anterior approach was the most preferred (62.1%). For nerve-sparing, the combined antegrade-retrograde approach (43.7%) and the antegrade-only approaches (36.8%) were most common. Approximately half of respondents (51.7%) preferred cut-and-suture ligation for dorsal venous complex control. For pelvic lymph node dissection, standard (44.8%) or limited (29.9%) templates were preferred over the extended (24.1%) template. The most common method for vascular control was clips for vascular pedicle ligation (79.3%). Of the continence-preserving techniques, most respondents agreed on the importance of maximal urethral length preservation (93.1%), bladder neck preservation (80.5%), and posterior reconstruction (64.4%). Postoperatively, most surgeons endorsed early mobilization (92%), early oral nutrition (85.1%), and non-opioid oral analgesia (57.5%). All US-based surgeons reported discharging ≥ 70% of patients on postoperative day 1, whereas discharge patterns varied among non-US surgeons. There are significant global variations in the practice of RARP. These findings point to the potential utility of consensus-driven, evidence-based guidelines to optimize RARP practices worldwide.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
University of California, Riverside (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Chapman University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (VN), University of California System (US), City of Hope (US), Bệnh viện Bình Dân (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon