Training-free interpretation of count-calibrated density maps for label-free cell localization

Abstract Density maps support object counting by integration, but their continuous outputs do not directly provide coordinates for cell-level analysis. We developed multi-scale density map interpretation (MSDMI), a training-free method that recovers cell-center coordinates from count-calibrated density maps. MSDMI calculates local density mass using two-dimensional moving sums, thresholds responses across window sizes, accumulates support maps, and returns regional maxima as coordinates. In a best-attainable analysis of 10 density maps, the median optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) distance was 3.9046 pixels for MSDMI, versus 19.298 for Gaussian blur plus watershed and 19.501 for direct binarization. OSPA distances differed among methods (Friedman test, p = 4.54 × 10−5), and MSDMI outperformed both after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.0039 each). Recovered coordinates also supported single-cell fluorescence measurement, extending density-map outputs from counting to localization and functional analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/aeb94f
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training-free interpretation of count-calibrated density maps for label-free cell localization

Rika Numano, Ryuto Shinozaki
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Training-free interpretation of count-calibrated density maps for label-free cell localization

Rika Numano, Ryuto Shinozaki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Density maps support object counting by integration, but their continuous outputs do not directly provide coordinates for cell-level analysis. We developed multi-scale density map interpretation (MSDMI), a training-free method that recovers cell-center coordinates from count-calibrated density maps. MSDMI calculates local density mass using two-dimensional moving sums, thresholds responses across window sizes, accumulates support maps, and returns regional maxima as coordinates. In a best-attainable analysis of 10 density maps, the median optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) distance was 3.9046 pixels for MSDMI, versus 19.298 for Gaussian blur plus watershed and 19.501 for direct binarization. OSPA distances differed among methods (Friedman test, p = 4.54 × 10−5), and MSDMI outperformed both after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.0039 each). Recovered coordinates also supported single-cell fluorescence measurement, extending density-map outputs from counting to localization and functional analysis.

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Toyohashi University of Technology (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon