Prevalence of Sinus Pathology in Dentistry: Retrospective Observational Study
Background: Changes in the sinus membrane in the form of thickening or opacification often pose challenges in the differential diagnosis between rhinological and odontogenic causes. Due to their clinical similarities, the development of a radiological diagnosis, with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) being the technique of choice, will be crucial for achieving an accurate diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A descriptive retrospective study was designed, comprising a pilot sample of 180 patients from the institution. The research applies Di Girolamo’s classification to categorize radiological findings and assesses the relationship between sinus pathology and factors such as age, gender, and odontogenic causes. Results: A total of 180 CBCT scans and health surveys from patients (126 males and 54 females), with mean age of 60 ± 8.14 years were studied. Some type of sinus pathology was observed in 135 sinuses (75%) and no pathology in 45 sinuses (25%). Regarding potential etiology, dental pathology was the most prevalent (63.6%), followed by implants (18%). Conclusion: There is a high incidence of sinus pathology. Sinus pathology is diagnosed more frequently in men and smokers. The most common types of sinus pathology are thickening of the sinus membrane, followed by opacification of the maxillary sinus.
Authors
- Cristina Méniz-García (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-8766)
- Juan López-Quiles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-0526)
- Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-2335)
- Ricardo Ortega-Aranegui
- Carlos Manuel Cobo-Vázquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9263-5972)
- Elena Gutiérrez-Muñoz
- Patricia Padilla-Martín
Institutions
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sinusitis
- Published
- 2026-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/sinusitis10020025
- Primary Topic
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00