India and the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement: The Unfinished Equity Question

India formally accepted the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies in July 2026, but this did not bring the negotiations to an end. The Agreement bans subsidies tied to illegal and unregulated fishing and overfished stocks, but broader subsidy rules contributing to overcapacity and overfishing remain unsettled. This article highlights India’s evolution from prioritizing the protection of small-scale and artisanal fisheries to currently challenging the use of aggregate subsidy levels for differentiation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data from 2020 to 2022 indicate that while total support figures for OECD members and non-members appear similar, the average support per fisher significantly differs, at $5,722 for members and $283 for non-members. This comparison supports India’s argument, but environmental harm depends on subsidy type, fleet capacity, fishing location, stock condition and fisheries management rather than support per fisher alone. India’s acceptance endorses current agreements and raises concerns about equitable burden distribution for further regulations among countries with varied fishing sectors and historical subsidies. JEL Classification: F13, F53, Q22, Q28

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics Research Review
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441261494312
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

India and the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement: The Unfinished Equity Question

Smita Sirohi, Kamlesh Acharya
Agricultural Economics Research Review
World Trade Organization Law
article

India and the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement: The Unfinished Equity Question

Smita Sirohi, Kamlesh Acharya
article en

Abstract

India formally accepted the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies in July 2026, but this did not bring the negotiations to an end. The Agreement bans subsidies tied to illegal and unregulated fishing and overfished stocks, but broader subsidy rules contributing to overcapacity and overfishing remain unsettled. This article highlights India’s evolution from prioritizing the protection of small-scale and artisanal fisheries to currently challenging the use of aggregate subsidy levels for differentiation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data from 2020 to 2022 indicate that while total support figures for OECD members and non-members appear similar, the average support per fisher significantly differs, at $5,722 for members and $283 for non-members. This comparison supports India’s argument, but environmental harm depends on subsidy type, fleet capacity, fishing location, stock condition and fisheries management rather than support per fisher alone. India’s acceptance endorses current agreements and raises concerns about equitable burden distribution for further regulations among countries with varied fishing sectors and historical subsidies. JEL Classification: F13, F53, Q22, Q28

Agricultural Economics Research Review
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon