Domain-Holdout Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models for Phishing URL Classification

Phishing URLs are used to direct users to deceptive web resources that may attempt to obtain credentials, payment information, or other sensitive data. This paper reports a comparative experiment using the PhiUSIIL Phishing URL dataset and three classifiers: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network. The reported methodology uses eleven URL-related features and a registered-domain-held-out evaluation intended to reduce optimistic estimates caused by URLs from the same domain appearing in both training and testing data. In the supplied domain-held-out results file, MLP achieved the highest accuracy (99.5861%), F1-score (99.5087%), and ROC-AUC (0.99837), while Logistic Regression achieved the highest phishing precision (99.9640%) and Random Forest achieved the highest phishing recall (99.1983%). These are results from the supplied experiment output and should not be interpreted as proof of performance on all future phishing campaigns. A split-audit file supplied separately reports a different train/test row count, so the final split metadata and confusion matrix must be regenerated from the same run before public release. Keywords—phishing URL detection, domain holdout, machine learning, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, multilayer perceptron, cybersecurity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23657213
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Domain-Holdout Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models for Phishing URL Classification

Sarthak Shinde
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spam and Phishing Detection
preprint

Domain-Holdout Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models for Phishing URL Classification

Sarthak Shinde
preprint en

Abstract

Phishing URLs are used to direct users to deceptive web resources that may attempt to obtain credentials, payment information, or other sensitive data. This paper reports a comparative experiment using the PhiUSIIL Phishing URL dataset and three classifiers: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network. The reported methodology uses eleven URL-related features and a registered-domain-held-out evaluation intended to reduce optimistic estimates caused by URLs from the same domain appearing in both training and testing data. In the supplied domain-held-out results file, MLP achieved the highest accuracy (99.5861%), F1-score (99.5087%), and ROC-AUC (0.99837), while Logistic Regression achieved the highest phishing precision (99.9640%) and Random Forest achieved the highest phishing recall (99.1983%). These are results from the supplied experiment output and should not be interpreted as proof of performance on all future phishing campaigns. A split-audit file supplied separately reports a different train/test row count, so the final split metadata and confusion matrix must be regenerated from the same run before public release. Keywords—phishing URL detection, domain holdout, machine learning, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, multilayer perceptron, cybersecurity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Domain-Holdout Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models for Phishing URL Classification — Sarthak Shinde · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS