Rembrandt through the eyes of the machine: Toward explainable Human–AI collaboration in painting attribution

With questions that persist for centuries, art attribution is a complex detective effort that shapes cultural identity. Our goal is to complement human expertise, providing statistical and visual arguments that shed new light on discussions about great masters like Rembrandt and beyond, with long-term implications for art analysis and human-AI collaboration. We present an AI-driven explainable approach to assist painting attribution with up to 97.9% recall, 95.8% accuracy when highly confident, and methods that identify the most relevant areas. This work supports human-AI collaboration by incorporating expert guidance, expanding the outputs with explainable visualizations, tailoring settings to users' needs, thorough calibrations to avoid overconfidence, and building a dataset that balances quality with quantity and focuses on comparable artists like a master's pupils and teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2626989123
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rembrandt through the eyes of the machine: Toward explainable Human–AI collaboration in painting attribution

Arthur K. Wheelock, Andrés Arias–Rosales, Philip R. LeDuc, Jonathan Cagan et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Rembrandt through the eyes of the machine: Toward explainable Human–AI collaboration in painting attribution

Arthur K. Wheelock, Andrés Arias–Rosales, Philip R. LeDuc, Jonathan Cagan, J. Kenneth Moritz
article en

Abstract

With questions that persist for centuries, art attribution is a complex detective effort that shapes cultural identity. Our goal is to complement human expertise, providing statistical and visual arguments that shed new light on discussions about great masters like Rembrandt and beyond, with long-term implications for art analysis and human-AI collaboration. We present an AI-driven explainable approach to assist painting attribution with up to 97.9% recall, 95.8% accuracy when highly confident, and methods that identify the most relevant areas. This work supports human-AI collaboration by incorporating expert guidance, expanding the outputs with explainable visualizations, tailoring settings to users' needs, thorough calibrations to avoid overconfidence, and building a dataset that balances quality with quantity and focuses on comparable artists like a master's pupils and teachers.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(45)
University of Maryland, College Park (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Universidad EAFIT (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon