NRF2 signalling in environmental metal and metalloid neurotoxicity: distinguishing stress responses from functional neuroprotection

Exposure to toxic metals and metalloids is an important public health concern because they can damage the nervous system and impair cognitive and motor function. Oxidative stress, disturbed glutathione balance, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation are common features of this damage. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) regulates proteins that help cells maintain redox balance and withstand toxic stress. Increased NRF2 expression after metal exposure is therefore often interpreted as evidence of protection. However, expression alone does not show that the pathway is working effectively. Functional activation requires NRF2 nuclear translocation, binding to antioxidant-response elements, induction of target genes and improvement in redox or mitochondrial function. This review critically examines human, animal and cellular evidence concerning NRF2 responses to cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic and manganese. It considers how dose, duration, brain region and cell type shape these responses and evaluates compounds intended to modify NRF2 signalling. It assesses whether NRF2 dependence was demonstrated using genetic deletion, knockdown, pharmacological inhibition or rescue rather than inferred from expression changes. Current evidence supports NRF2 as an important but context-dependent defence mechanism. However, causal evidence remains uneven, human data are limited and many proposed activators have effects beyond NRF2. Future studies should use environmentally relevant exposures and directly measure pathway activity, mitochondrial function and neurological outcomes. This is necessary to determine whether NRF2 modulation can provide safe and meaningful protection against environmental neurotoxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Toxicology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2026.1988769
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NRF2 signalling in environmental metal and metalloid neurotoxicity: distinguishing stress responses from functional neuroprotection

Rademene Sunday Oria, Flavien Nsoni Bumbangi, Alfred Omachonu Okpanachi, Uthman Ademola Yusuf et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Toxicology
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
article

NRF2 signalling in environmental metal and metalloid neurotoxicity: distinguishing stress responses from functional neuroprotection

Rademene Sunday Oria, Flavien Nsoni Bumbangi, Alfred Omachonu Okpanachi, Uthman Ademola Yusuf, Bolaji Samuel Mesole
article en

Abstract

Exposure to toxic metals and metalloids is an important public health concern because they can damage the nervous system and impair cognitive and motor function. Oxidative stress, disturbed glutathione balance, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation are common features of this damage. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) regulates proteins that help cells maintain redox balance and withstand toxic stress. Increased NRF2 expression after metal exposure is therefore often interpreted as evidence of protection. However, expression alone does not show that the pathway is working effectively. Functional activation requires NRF2 nuclear translocation, binding to antioxidant-response elements, induction of target genes and improvement in redox or mitochondrial function. This review critically examines human, animal and cellular evidence concerning NRF2 responses to cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic and manganese. It considers how dose, duration, brain region and cell type shape these responses and evaluates compounds intended to modify NRF2 signalling. It assesses whether NRF2 dependence was demonstrated using genetic deletion, knockdown, pharmacological inhibition or rescue rather than inferred from expression changes. Current evidence supports NRF2 as an important but context-dependent defence mechanism. However, causal evidence remains uneven, human data are limited and many proposed activators have effects beyond NRF2. Future studies should use environmentally relevant exposures and directly measure pathway activity, mitochondrial function and neurological outcomes. This is necessary to determine whether NRF2 modulation can provide safe and meaningful protection against environmental neurotoxicity.

Frontiers in ToxicologyVol. 8
University of Cross River State (NG), Mulungushi University (ZM), University of Uyo (NG), Eden University (ZM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon