Fewer, but seen more often: an inferential re-analysis of sex, alignment and appearances among Marvel and DC characters

In 2014 the data journalism site FiveThirtyEight scraped the fan-maintained Marvel and DC wikis and reported that women made up about one in four characters in each publisher's mainstream universe. That analysis was descriptive: it counted characters, but did not model how often characters appear. This article re-analyses the same public data with standard inferential methods. It focuses on 18,013 characters with a recorded appearance count, an alignment (good, bad or neutral) and a male or female sex. Because appearance counts are extremely skewed (median 4, maximum 4,043), all models use the base-10 logarithm, and results are reported as geometric means. A typical DC character appears about 1.7 times as often as a typical Marvel character (6.9 against 4.2 appearances). Good characters appear more often than neutral and bad ones (7.4, 4.6 and 3.6), but alignment explains only about 6% of the variation. The most notable result concerns sex. Female characters are a minority (24.5% at Marvel, 28.5% at DC), yet among the characters that exist, women appear more often than men at both publishers, and the gap is larger at Marvel (5.4 against 3.8) than at DC (7.6 against 6.7). The interaction is small but clear. It agrees with FiveThirtyEight's observation that women's share rises among frequently appearing characters, and it suggests that counting characters and measuring their prominence answer different questions. The article sets out why these associations are not causal. Bad-aligned characters are mostly male and appear least, appearance counts accumulate over time, and fan wikis record popular characters more fully. It closes with a randomised design that could test causal questions. The R script and the data accompany this preprint. Status: preprint, not peer reviewed. Files: the article (PDF; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0); comics_analysis.R, the full analysis in one R script (MIT licence); comic_characters.csv, FiveThirtyEight's 2014 comic-characters data (the DC and Marvel wiki files merged, with a publisher column added; CC BY 4.0, source: https://github.com/fivethirtyeight/data/tree/master/comic-characters); a README and the licence file. Use of generative AI: the article's text was drafted with Claude (Anthropic; Claude Opus 5.5) from the author's analysis outputs. The author ran every analysis, reviewed and revised the text, and takes full responsibility for the content (see the declaration in the article).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23651014
Primary Topic
Media, Gender, and Advertising
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Fewer, but seen more often: an inferential re-analysis of sex, alignment and appearances among Marvel and DC characters

Abdul Nafey Syed
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Media, Gender, and Advertising
preprint

Fewer, but seen more often: an inferential re-analysis of sex, alignment and appearances among Marvel and DC characters

Abdul Nafey Syed
preprint en

Abstract

In 2014 the data journalism site FiveThirtyEight scraped the fan-maintained Marvel and DC wikis and reported that women made up about one in four characters in each publisher's mainstream universe. That analysis was descriptive: it counted characters, but did not model how often characters appear. This article re-analyses the same public data with standard inferential methods. It focuses on 18,013 characters with a recorded appearance count, an alignment (good, bad or neutral) and a male or female sex. Because appearance counts are extremely skewed (median 4, maximum 4,043), all models use the base-10 logarithm, and results are reported as geometric means. A typical DC character appears about 1.7 times as often as a typical Marvel character (6.9 against 4.2 appearances). Good characters appear more often than neutral and bad ones (7.4, 4.6 and 3.6), but alignment explains only about 6% of the variation. The most notable result concerns sex. Female characters are a minority (24.5% at Marvel, 28.5% at DC), yet among the characters that exist, women appear more often than men at both publishers, and the gap is larger at Marvel (5.4 against 3.8) than at DC (7.6 against 6.7). The interaction is small but clear. It agrees with FiveThirtyEight's observation that women's share rises among frequently appearing characters, and it suggests that counting characters and measuring their prominence answer different questions. The article sets out why these associations are not causal. Bad-aligned characters are mostly male and appear least, appearance counts accumulate over time, and fan wikis record popular characters more fully. It closes with a randomised design that could test causal questions. The R script and the data accompany this preprint. Status: preprint, not peer reviewed. Files: the article (PDF; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0); comics_analysis.R, the full analysis in one R script (MIT licence); comic_characters.csv, FiveThirtyEight's 2014 comic-characters data (the DC and Marvel wiki files merged, with a publisher column added; CC BY 4.0, source: https://github.com/fivethirtyeight/data/tree/master/comic-characters); a README and the licence file. Use of generative AI: the article's text was drafted with Claude (Anthropic; Claude Opus 5.5) from the author's analysis outputs. The author ran every analysis, reviewed and revised the text, and takes full responsibility for the content (see the declaration in the article).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fenerbahçe University (TR)
Gender equality, Reduced inequalities
Media, Gender, and Advertising
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon