Realizing the Noumenal Republic: Forst and Kant on Representation and Institutional Design

Abstract In The Noumenal Republic , Rainer Forst understands democracy as a demand for justice grounded in the ‘right to justification’. This right stipulates that justificatory reasons must be (i) reciprocally and generally justifiable in their content/form and (ii) generated through procedures in which all affected figure as co-authors. Despite the numerous strengths of this theory, I argue that Forst’s account encounters a problem when addressing the justification of commonplace cases of representation: although each dimension independently provides normative space for justifying representative practices, their simultaneous application generates mutually undermining outcomes. After showing how Kant deals with this issue, I invite Forst to further elaborate on how his Kantian democratic theory plays out at an institutional level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kantian Review
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415426101599
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realizing the Noumenal Republic: Forst and Kant on Representation and Institutional Design

Elisabeth Theresia Widmer
Kantian Review
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Realizing the Noumenal Republic: Forst and Kant on Representation and Institutional Design

Elisabeth Theresia Widmer
article en

Abstract

Abstract In The Noumenal Republic , Rainer Forst understands democracy as a demand for justice grounded in the ‘right to justification’. This right stipulates that justificatory reasons must be (i) reciprocally and generally justifiable in their content/form and (ii) generated through procedures in which all affected figure as co-authors. Despite the numerous strengths of this theory, I argue that Forst’s account encounters a problem when addressing the justification of commonplace cases of representation: although each dimension independently provides normative space for justifying representative practices, their simultaneous application generates mutually undermining outcomes. After showing how Kant deals with this issue, I invite Forst to further elaborate on how his Kantian democratic theory plays out at an institutional level.

Kantian Review
Rice University (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon