What Drives Voter Bias Against Muslim Politicians? An Experimental Examination

Abstract Religious and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in political office, but its reasons are debated. Using administrative data from Norwegian local elections, we show that candidates with Muslim names receive fewer personal votes, and propose that this is (partly) due to political beliefs about Muslims as politicians.To examine this claim, we identify salient political beliefs and implement a conjoint experiment that estimates anti-Muslim bias with and without information on these beliefs.In a low-information setting, respondents exhibit a substantial anti-Muslim bias, but providing belief-relevant information reduces this anti-Muslim bias by 2–5 percentage points. The largest reduction occurs when respondents learn candidates’ positions on minority-rights issues. This reduction is driven by right-wing voters and is large enough to eliminate the left-right gap in anti-Muslim bias. These findings show a strong political component in the anti-Muslim bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10213-z
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Drives Voter Bias Against Muslim Politicians? An Experimental Examination

Rino Heim, Henning Finseraas
Political Behavior
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

What Drives Voter Bias Against Muslim Politicians? An Experimental Examination

Rino Heim, Henning Finseraas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Religious and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in political office, but its reasons are debated. Using administrative data from Norwegian local elections, we show that candidates with Muslim names receive fewer personal votes, and propose that this is (partly) due to political beliefs about Muslims as politicians.To examine this claim, we identify salient political beliefs and implement a conjoint experiment that estimates anti-Muslim bias with and without information on these beliefs.In a low-information setting, respondents exhibit a substantial anti-Muslim bias, but providing belief-relevant information reduces this anti-Muslim bias by 2–5 percentage points. The largest reduction occurs when respondents learn candidates’ positions on minority-rights issues. This reduction is driven by right-wing voters and is large enough to eliminate the left-right gap in anti-Muslim bias. These findings show a strong political component in the anti-Muslim bias.

Political Behavior
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon