Global research on urban density and health: A bibliometric analysis of trends, themes, and research priorities

Urban density is a central concern in urban design and public health, yet evidence on its relationships with health is dispersed across disciplines. This study used bibliometric methods to map the global research landscape on urban density and health, and to identify publication trends, themes, key contributors, and research priorities. A search of the Web of Science Core Collection in May 2025 combined terms for density, health, and urban context. English-language articles and reviews were screened, cleaned, and analysed. Performance analysis and science mapping techniques, including co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence, were conducted using VOSviewer. The dataset comprised 1,670 publications published between 1965 and 2025, with marked growth after 2019. Research output was concentrated in high-income countries, particularly the Global North, with no African country among the most productive contributors. Frequently co-cited sources showed a multidisciplinary field spanning public health, urban design, and physical activity research. Keyword analysis identified nine clusters. Built environment, walkability, and physical activity formed the core. Green space and metabolic health appeared as a distinct but less prominent cluster. These findings show that density-health research has been organised mainly around built environment and movement-related pathways. Psychosocial, environmental exposure, and equity-related pathways remain less integrated. For urban health practice, the findings identify evidence gaps that are relevant to policy and planning. These patterns indicate a need for broader geographical coverage, stronger attention to non-mobility and psychosocial pathways, clearer and more comparable density measures, and deeper cross-disciplinary integration to generate evidence that can better inform healthy densification policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Place
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2026.103757
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global research on urban density and health: A bibliometric analysis of trends, themes, and research priorities

Jiuling Li, Andrew T. Kaczynski, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Tomoya Hanibuchi et al.
Health & Place
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Global research on urban density and health: A bibliometric analysis of trends, themes, and research priorities

Jiuling Li, Andrew T. Kaczynski, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Tomoya Hanibuchi, Ying Long, Becky P.Y. Loo, Md. Sabbir Hossain Khan, Koichiro Oka, Jing Zhao, Yi Lu
article en

Abstract

Urban density is a central concern in urban design and public health, yet evidence on its relationships with health is dispersed across disciplines. This study used bibliometric methods to map the global research landscape on urban density and health, and to identify publication trends, themes, key contributors, and research priorities. A search of the Web of Science Core Collection in May 2025 combined terms for density, health, and urban context. English-language articles and reviews were screened, cleaned, and analysed. Performance analysis and science mapping techniques, including co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence, were conducted using VOSviewer. The dataset comprised 1,670 publications published between 1965 and 2025, with marked growth after 2019. Research output was concentrated in high-income countries, particularly the Global North, with no African country among the most productive contributors. Frequently co-cited sources showed a multidisciplinary field spanning public health, urban design, and physical activity research. Keyword analysis identified nine clusters. Built environment, walkability, and physical activity formed the core. Green space and metabolic health appeared as a distinct but less prominent cluster. These findings show that density-health research has been organised mainly around built environment and movement-related pathways. Psychosocial, environmental exposure, and equity-related pathways remain less integrated. For urban health practice, the findings identify evidence gaps that are relevant to policy and planning. These patterns indicate a need for broader geographical coverage, stronger attention to non-mobility and psychosocial pathways, clearer and more comparable density measures, and deeper cross-disciplinary integration to generate evidence that can better inform healthy densification policies.

Health & PlaceVol. 102
Waseda University (JP), University of South Carolina (US), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Guangzhou University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon