Modelling the potential contributions of polygenic risk stratification to cost-effective screening for prostate cancer

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. The use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to enhance individual risk stratification and guide early detection strategies has attracted growing research and policy interest. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of PRS-guided screening strategies for PCa within a UK context. Methods The Prostata microsimulation model, calibrated to UK-specific epidemiological and clinical data, simulated individual life histories, including PCa onset, progression, and outcomes by Gleason score and metastatic status. The model incorporated both measured and unmeasured components of polygenic risk and accounted for ancestry-specific distributions. We compared a no-screening baseline with one-off prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening at ages 50, 60, or 70, and with repeated uniform screening every 4 or 2 years between ages 50 and 69, both with and without PRS-based stratification. Results Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were similar across all strategies, while costs differed more substantially. The no-screening scenario yielded the lowest lifetime costs and marginally lower life expectancy. PRS-informed strategies were dominated, being more costly and less effective than alternatives. Conclusion PRS-guided PCa screening was unlikely to be cost-effective in modelled scenarios compared with either no screening or simple age-based PSA testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01969-6
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the potential contributions of polygenic risk stratification to cost-effective screening for prostate cancer

Jonathan J. Aning, Mark Clements, Padraig Dixon, Richard Michael Martin
The European Journal of Health Economics
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Modelling the potential contributions of polygenic risk stratification to cost-effective screening for prostate cancer

Jonathan J. Aning, Mark Clements, Padraig Dixon, Richard Michael Martin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. The use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to enhance individual risk stratification and guide early detection strategies has attracted growing research and policy interest. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of PRS-guided screening strategies for PCa within a UK context. Methods The Prostata microsimulation model, calibrated to UK-specific epidemiological and clinical data, simulated individual life histories, including PCa onset, progression, and outcomes by Gleason score and metastatic status. The model incorporated both measured and unmeasured components of polygenic risk and accounted for ancestry-specific distributions. We compared a no-screening baseline with one-off prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening at ages 50, 60, or 70, and with repeated uniform screening every 4 or 2 years between ages 50 and 69, both with and without PRS-based stratification. Results Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were similar across all strategies, while costs differed more substantially. The no-screening scenario yielded the lowest lifetime costs and marginally lower life expectancy. PRS-informed strategies were dominated, being more costly and less effective than alternatives. Conclusion PRS-guided PCa screening was unlikely to be cost-effective in modelled scenarios compared with either no screening or simple age-based PSA testing.

The European Journal of Health Economics
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Modelling the potential contributions of polygenic risk stratification to cost-effective screening for prostate cancer — Jonathan J. Aning, Mark Clements, et al. · The European Journal of Health Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS