Climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across agroecological zones in Gedeo, Ethiopia: evidence from problem confrontation index and multinomial regression

Climate change increasingly threatens apiculture by reducing floral resources, water availability, and colony productivity. Although beekeepers adopt various adaptation measures, barriers to effective adaptation remain poorly understood across different agro ecological settings. This study examined the determinants and severity of climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across three agro ecological zones in Gedeo Zone, southern Ethiopia. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed using data from 398 beekeeper households, complemented by 15 focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The Problem Confrontation Index (PCI) was used to prioritize adaptation barriers, while the Kruskal–Wallis H test assessed differences across agro ecological zones. Multinomial logistic regression identified socioeconomic and institutional determinants of perceived adaptation barriers. The most severe adaptation barriers were lack of improved beekeeping technology (PCI = 1056), lack of credit (PCI = 1047), water scarcity (PCI = 939), lack of training (PCI = 934), and shortage of bee-forage plants (PCI = 921). Significant agro ecological differences were observed for water scarcity ( p = 0.011), pests and diseases ( p = 0.017), and lack of finance ( p = 0.025), whereas most institutional and technological barriers were common across zones. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that age, sex, education, income, climate information, and particularly beekeeping practices significantly influenced the likelihood of experiencing different adaptation barriers ( p < 0.05). Climate change adaptation barriers in apiculture arise from interacting technological, financial, institutional, and environmental constraints. Strengthening access to improved beekeeping technologies, affordable credit, climate information, extension services, and training, while implementing agro ecology-specific interventions, is essential for enhancing the climate resilience and sustainability of beekeeping livelihoods in Ethiopia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76751-y
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across agroecological zones in Gedeo, Ethiopia: evidence from problem confrontation index and multinomial regression

Tadesse Tujuba Kenea, Nebiyu Yemane Asfaw, Ermias Arega Mengistu
Scientific Reports
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across agroecological zones in Gedeo, Ethiopia: evidence from problem confrontation index and multinomial regression

Tadesse Tujuba Kenea, Nebiyu Yemane Asfaw, Ermias Arega Mengistu
article en

Abstract

Climate change increasingly threatens apiculture by reducing floral resources, water availability, and colony productivity. Although beekeepers adopt various adaptation measures, barriers to effective adaptation remain poorly understood across different agro ecological settings. This study examined the determinants and severity of climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across three agro ecological zones in Gedeo Zone, southern Ethiopia. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed using data from 398 beekeeper households, complemented by 15 focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The Problem Confrontation Index (PCI) was used to prioritize adaptation barriers, while the Kruskal–Wallis H test assessed differences across agro ecological zones. Multinomial logistic regression identified socioeconomic and institutional determinants of perceived adaptation barriers. The most severe adaptation barriers were lack of improved beekeeping technology (PCI = 1056), lack of credit (PCI = 1047), water scarcity (PCI = 939), lack of training (PCI = 934), and shortage of bee-forage plants (PCI = 921). Significant agro ecological differences were observed for water scarcity ( p = 0.011), pests and diseases ( p = 0.017), and lack of finance ( p = 0.025), whereas most institutional and technological barriers were common across zones. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that age, sex, education, income, climate information, and particularly beekeeping practices significantly influenced the likelihood of experiencing different adaptation barriers ( p < 0.05). Climate change adaptation barriers in apiculture arise from interacting technological, financial, institutional, and environmental constraints. Strengthening access to improved beekeeping technologies, affordable credit, climate information, extension services, and training, while implementing agro ecology-specific interventions, is essential for enhancing the climate resilience and sustainability of beekeeping livelihoods in Ethiopia.

Scientific Reports
Arba Minch University (ET), Adama Science and Technology University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon