‘You Cry and then You Just Carry on and Protect Your Children from it’: Unpacking the Impacts of Law on the Well-being of Gender-Diverse Young People and Their Families

In the United Kingdom, legal cases focused on gender care for young people have been widely publicised in both traditional and social media. As part of the Longitudinal Outcomes of Gender Identity in Children – Qualitative (LOGIC-Q) study, thirty-nine families were interviewed over five interview waves. Transcripts were analysed using a longitudinal thematic approach to understand what sense families made of various legal processes and how they experienced the practical consequences. Thirty-four families had narratives around these perceptions and experiences over the four different time-points. Three broad themes were generated: (1) Whose voice was included? (2) layers of distress and (3) families’ perceptions of legal judgements in the media. Both parents and young people spoke about experiences of anxiety and uncertainty where the consequences of judicial decisions around health care reverberated beyond the legal system itself. In this regard, the profound impact of such legal cases on the well-being of young people and their families should not be underestimated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Law International
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332261495727
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘You Cry and then You Just Carry on and Protect Your Children from it’: Unpacking the Impacts of Law on the Well-being of Gender-Diverse Young People and Their Families

Kathy McKay, Eilis Kennedy
Medical Law International
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

‘You Cry and then You Just Carry on and Protect Your Children from it’: Unpacking the Impacts of Law on the Well-being of Gender-Diverse Young People and Their Families

Kathy McKay, Eilis Kennedy
article en

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, legal cases focused on gender care for young people have been widely publicised in both traditional and social media. As part of the Longitudinal Outcomes of Gender Identity in Children – Qualitative (LOGIC-Q) study, thirty-nine families were interviewed over five interview waves. Transcripts were analysed using a longitudinal thematic approach to understand what sense families made of various legal processes and how they experienced the practical consequences. Thirty-four families had narratives around these perceptions and experiences over the four different time-points. Three broad themes were generated: (1) Whose voice was included? (2) layers of distress and (3) families’ perceptions of legal judgements in the media. Both parents and young people spoke about experiences of anxiety and uncertainty where the consequences of judicial decisions around health care reverberated beyond the legal system itself. In this regard, the profound impact of such legal cases on the well-being of young people and their families should not be underestimated.

Medical Law International
North London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon