Patterns of intergenerational child protection involvement and young people’s criminal justice contact: Findings from a population-based Australian study

This study examined intergenerational patterns of child protection system involvement and subsequent criminal justice system contact up to age ~18 years in a sample of 75,784 Australian young people and their parents. Families were classified into four patterns: ‘cycle maintainers’ (both generations known to child protection), ‘cycle initiators’ (young people only), ‘cycle breakers’ (parents only) and no history of child protection. Prevalence of criminal justice contacts increased across the four intergenerational patterns (no history < ‘cycle breakers’ < ‘cycle initiators’ < ‘cycle maintainers’). Findings highlight the need to understand system involvement as a cumulative, cross-sector process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Youth Justice
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254261495765
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of intergenerational child protection involvement and young people’s criminal justice contact: Findings from a population-based Australian study

Merran Butler, Tyson Whitten, Vaughan J. Carr, Oliver J. Watkeys et al.
Youth Justice
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Patterns of intergenerational child protection involvement and young people’s criminal justice contact: Findings from a population-based Australian study

Merran Butler, Tyson Whitten, Vaughan J. Carr, Oliver J. Watkeys, Emma F. McKenzie, Stacy Tzoumakis, Melissa Mei Yin Cheung, Melissa J. Green, Kimberlie Dean, Ken Zulumovski
article en

Abstract

This study examined intergenerational patterns of child protection system involvement and subsequent criminal justice system contact up to age ~18 years in a sample of 75,784 Australian young people and their parents. Families were classified into four patterns: ‘cycle maintainers’ (both generations known to child protection), ‘cycle initiators’ (young people only), ‘cycle breakers’ (parents only) and no history of child protection. Prevalence of criminal justice contacts increased across the four intergenerational patterns (no history < ‘cycle breakers’ < ‘cycle initiators’ < ‘cycle maintainers’). Findings highlight the need to understand system involvement as a cumulative, cross-sector process.

Youth Justice
Australian Institute of Criminology (AU), Griffith University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), NSW Department of Communities and Justice (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Patterns of intergenerational child protection involvement and young people’s criminal justice contact: Findings from a population-based Australian study — Merran Butler, Tyson Whitten, et al. · Youth Justice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS