Energy, Exergy, and Economic Assessment of a Modified Double‐Slope Solar Still Using Low‐Cost Heat‐Storage Materials

ABSTRACT In many arid and water‐scarce regions, the need for new methods of desalination that are inexpensive and environmentally friendly remains high as access to drinking water continues to be insufficient. Solar stills offer a viable solution, but their widespread use is limited due to low freshwater production and poor thermal performance. The current research investigates a traditional single‐slope solar still (TSS), a double‐slope solar still, and four modified double‐slope solar stills (with iron scraps, black Kanchey, shaving blade fins, and pebbles as thermal energy storage, respectively) (MSS‐1, MSS‐2, MSS‐3, MSS‐4, MSS‐5). In the study, MSS‐1 was the unmodified double‐slope system. The daily water yield in mL/day for various stills was recorded as follows: TSS: 1330, MSS‐1: 1890, MSS‐2: 2370, MSS‐3: 2450, MSS‐4: 3150, and MSS‐5: 2250. The MSS‐4 system (shaving blades) outperforms TSS, presenting the highest yield, increasing productivity by 136%. The peak energy efficiency for different solar stills was as follows: TSS: 29%, MSS‐1: 36.6%, MSS‐2: 46.5%, MSS‐3: 49.5%, MSS‐4: 52.5%, and MSS‐5: 38.3%, with MSS‐4 achieving the highest value of 58.5%. The maximum exergy efficiency recorded was TSS: 10%, MSS‐1: 11.5%, MSS‐2: 15.5%, MSS‐3: 19.6%, MSS‐4: 23.7%, and MSS‐5: 17.4%. According to the economic evaluation, the lowest cost of freshwater production for the modified solar stills was for MSS‐4 (Rs. 0.98/L), and was less than Rs. 1.85/L for TSS, which is a reduction of about 46.2%. The findings demonstrate that integrating a double‐slope configuration with thermal energy storage materials and an enhanced heat‐transfer surface area leads to a substantial improvement in freshwater yield.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70555
Primary Topic
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy, Exergy, and Economic Assessment of a Modified Double‐Slope Solar Still Using Low‐Cost Heat‐Storage Materials

Rahul Kumar, Kshitij Yugbodh, Akhilesh Kumar, Virendra Mafaji RAJPUT et al.
Energy Storage
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
article

Energy, Exergy, and Economic Assessment of a Modified Double‐Slope Solar Still Using Low‐Cost Heat‐Storage Materials

Rahul Kumar, Kshitij Yugbodh, Akhilesh Kumar, Virendra Mafaji RAJPUT, Rahul Agrawal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many arid and water‐scarce regions, the need for new methods of desalination that are inexpensive and environmentally friendly remains high as access to drinking water continues to be insufficient. Solar stills offer a viable solution, but their widespread use is limited due to low freshwater production and poor thermal performance. The current research investigates a traditional single‐slope solar still (TSS), a double‐slope solar still, and four modified double‐slope solar stills (with iron scraps, black Kanchey, shaving blade fins, and pebbles as thermal energy storage, respectively) (MSS‐1, MSS‐2, MSS‐3, MSS‐4, MSS‐5). In the study, MSS‐1 was the unmodified double‐slope system. The daily water yield in mL/day for various stills was recorded as follows: TSS: 1330, MSS‐1: 1890, MSS‐2: 2370, MSS‐3: 2450, MSS‐4: 3150, and MSS‐5: 2250. The MSS‐4 system (shaving blades) outperforms TSS, presenting the highest yield, increasing productivity by 136%. The peak energy efficiency for different solar stills was as follows: TSS: 29%, MSS‐1: 36.6%, MSS‐2: 46.5%, MSS‐3: 49.5%, MSS‐4: 52.5%, and MSS‐5: 38.3%, with MSS‐4 achieving the highest value of 58.5%. The maximum exergy efficiency recorded was TSS: 10%, MSS‐1: 11.5%, MSS‐2: 15.5%, MSS‐3: 19.6%, MSS‐4: 23.7%, and MSS‐5: 17.4%. According to the economic evaluation, the lowest cost of freshwater production for the modified solar stills was for MSS‐4 (Rs. 0.98/L), and was less than Rs. 1.85/L for TSS, which is a reduction of about 46.2%. The findings demonstrate that integrating a double‐slope configuration with thermal energy storage materials and an enhanced heat‐transfer surface area leads to a substantial improvement in freshwater yield.

Energy StorageVol. 8(8)
Lovely Professional University (IN), Energy Storage Systems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon