Smart tools for diverse minds: how AI use impacts performance and well-being among neurodivergent employees

Purpose This study investigates how and when AI use at work relates to neurodivergent employees’ task performance and burnout. Drawing on Sociotechnical System Theory, the study proposes that executive functioning (EF) serves as the mediating mechanism and that social support serves as the moderating factor. Design/methodology/approach The three-wave survey data were collected from 286 neurodivergent employees in the United Kingdom, enabling temporal separation of the predictor, mediator, and outcome variables to reduce concerns for common method bias. Findings Results showed that AI use at work was positively associated with EF, which in turn was positively associated with task performance and negatively associated with burnout. Social support moderated these relationships, with AI use’s benefits for EF and subsequent performance and well-being emerging only when workplace social support was high. Originality/value This study advances a sociotechnical understanding of how AI use may support neurodivergent employees. By positioning AI as external cognitive scaffolding and social support as a key social system, the study clarifies how technological and social systems work together to shape work outcomes among neurodivergent employees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2026-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-02-2026-0161
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart tools for diverse minds: how AI use impacts performance and well-being among neurodivergent employees

Lu Xing, Kahn Tasker
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

Smart tools for diverse minds: how AI use impacts performance and well-being among neurodivergent employees

Lu Xing, Kahn Tasker
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates how and when AI use at work relates to neurodivergent employees’ task performance and burnout. Drawing on Sociotechnical System Theory, the study proposes that executive functioning (EF) serves as the mediating mechanism and that social support serves as the moderating factor. Design/methodology/approach The three-wave survey data were collected from 286 neurodivergent employees in the United Kingdom, enabling temporal separation of the predictor, mediator, and outcome variables to reduce concerns for common method bias. Findings Results showed that AI use at work was positively associated with EF, which in turn was positively associated with task performance and negatively associated with burnout. Social support moderated these relationships, with AI use’s benefits for EF and subsequent performance and well-being emerging only when workplace social support was high. Originality/value This study advances a sociotechnical understanding of how AI use may support neurodivergent employees. By positioning AI as external cognitive scaffolding and social support as a key social system, the study clarifies how technological and social systems work together to shape work outcomes among neurodivergent employees.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon