The Cost of Missed States: Online Tracking with Current-Observation Resets

An online tracker retains one state and may reset only to the current observation, although its complete observed history is available. Offline knows the future and obeys the same reset rule. Under a hard discrepancy radius, for every horizon $T\ge5$ and every feasible randomized causal policy, a fixed path on a known five-point metric requires at least $(T+1)/2$ expected refreshes, against exactly two offline refreshes with a strict radius margin. Missing the useful prefix center forces a refresh at every suffix observation. The path visits four values, with resolution fixed as $T$ grows. Write $J_λ$ for cumulative discrepancy plus a charge $λ>0$ per refresh, and $V_T$ for the sum of successive observation distances. A candidate prefix adapts Bienkowski and Schmid's randomized lower bound to this objective under current resets, even with a known horizon and $V_T<3λ$. This construction needs finer grids; a fixed finite metric with positive minimum separation instead admits a competitive policy for penalized tracking. An anytime policy satisfies $J_λ\leλ+4\sqrt{λTV_T}$ without knowing the horizon or final variation. Clipping for a known horizon gives $J_λ\leλT$ and a factor-three comparison with the minimum of three analytical bounds, without knowing final variation. Current-value diameter and readout sensitivity give same-input output bounds for mixtures, including squared-distance softmax.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66977/xsci.2610.003a
Primary Topic
Optimization and Search Problems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Cost of Missed States: Online Tracking with Current-Observation Resets

Hiroyasu Usami
Optimization and Search Problems
preprint

The Cost of Missed States: Online Tracking with Current-Observation Resets

Hiroyasu Usami
preprint en

Abstract

An online tracker retains one state and may reset only to the current observation, although its complete observed history is available. Offline knows the future and obeys the same reset rule. Under a hard discrepancy radius, for every horizon $T\ge5$ and every feasible randomized causal policy, a fixed path on a known five-point metric requires at least $(T+1)/2$ expected refreshes, against exactly two offline refreshes with a strict radius margin. Missing the useful prefix center forces a refresh at every suffix observation. The path visits four values, with resolution fixed as $T$ grows. Write $J_λ$ for cumulative discrepancy plus a charge $λ>0$ per refresh, and $V_T$ for the sum of successive observation distances. A candidate prefix adapts Bienkowski and Schmid's randomized lower bound to this objective under current resets, even with a known horizon and $V_T<3λ$. This construction needs finer grids; a fixed finite metric with positive minimum separation instead admits a competitive policy for penalized tracking. An anytime policy satisfies $J_λ\leλ+4\sqrt{λTV_T}$ without knowing the horizon or final variation. Clipping for a known horizon gives $J_λ\leλT$ and a factor-three comparison with the minimum of three analytical bounds, without knowing final variation. Current-value diameter and readout sensitivity give same-input output bounds for mixtures, including squared-distance softmax.

Chubu University (JP)
Optimization and Search Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon