Systematic Uncertainties in Rocky Exoplanet Reflected Light from Incomplete Laboratory BRDF Measurements

Abstract The first observations of short-period rocky exoplanets have initiated the era of terrestrial exoplanet characterization. The interpretation of these observations relies on forward models used in atmospheric and surface retrieval frameworks. While atmospheric modeling is supported by extensive laboratory datasets of molecular opacities, the experimental basis for rocky surface characterization remains limited. Most reflectance libraries of planetary analog materials provide spectra measured at a single illumination and viewing geometry, constraining the spectral behavior but not its full angular scattering properties. We show that incomplete angular coverage in laboratory bidirectional reflectance measurements introduces an intrinsic systematic uncertainty in the interpretation of rocky exoplanet observations. Using the Hapke photometric framework, we demonstrate that multiple combinations of photometric parameters can reproduce the same laboratory reflectance spectrum while predicting different angular scattering behaviors and disk-integrated observables. We propagate this nonuniqueness to reflected-light phase curves, geometric albedos, and planet–star contrast ratios between 0.5 and 1.7 μ m, representative of the spectral range targeted by future direct-imaging missions such as the Habitable Worlds Observatory. We find that single-geometry laboratory spectra produce large uncertainties in predicted signals, particularly at small phase angles where opposition effects dominate. Simplified assumptions commonly adopted in exoplanet studies, such as isotropic scattering or neglecting opposition effects, can additionally introduce large systematic biases. Using multiangular laboratory measurements from the Bloomsburg University Goniometer dataset, we show that the uncertainty in predicted observables collapses once angular scattering behavior is directly constrained. Our results demonstrate that multiangular measurements are required to construct physically predictive reflected-light models of rocky exoplanets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aeb6d6
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Systematic Uncertainties in Rocky Exoplanet Reflected Light from Incomplete Laboratory BRDF Measurements

F. J. Pozuelos, P. Helfenstein, Renyu Hu, L. Gkouvelis et al.
3 links
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Systematic Uncertainties in Rocky Exoplanet Reflected Light from Incomplete Laboratory BRDF Measurements

F. J. Pozuelos, P. Helfenstein, Renyu Hu, L. Gkouvelis, Michael K. Shepard
article en

Abstract

Abstract The first observations of short-period rocky exoplanets have initiated the era of terrestrial exoplanet characterization. The interpretation of these observations relies on forward models used in atmospheric and surface retrieval frameworks. While atmospheric modeling is supported by extensive laboratory datasets of molecular opacities, the experimental basis for rocky surface characterization remains limited. Most reflectance libraries of planetary analog materials provide spectra measured at a single illumination and viewing geometry, constraining the spectral behavior but not its full angular scattering properties. We show that incomplete angular coverage in laboratory bidirectional reflectance measurements introduces an intrinsic systematic uncertainty in the interpretation of rocky exoplanet observations. Using the Hapke photometric framework, we demonstrate that multiple combinations of photometric parameters can reproduce the same laboratory reflectance spectrum while predicting different angular scattering behaviors and disk-integrated observables. We propagate this nonuniqueness to reflected-light phase curves, geometric albedos, and planet–star contrast ratios between 0.5 and 1.7 μ m, representative of the spectral range targeted by future direct-imaging missions such as the Habitable Worlds Observatory. We find that single-geometry laboratory spectra produce large uncertainties in predicted signals, particularly at small phase angles where opposition effects dominate. Simplified assumptions commonly adopted in exoplanet studies, such as isotropic scattering or neglecting opposition effects, can additionally introduce large systematic biases. Using multiangular laboratory measurements from the Bloomsburg University Goniometer dataset, we show that the uncertainty in predicted observables collapses once angular scattering behavior is directly constrained. Our results demonstrate that multiangular measurements are required to construct physically predictive reflected-light models of rocky exoplanets.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 172(6)
California Institute of Technology (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Cornell University (US), Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon