Repetition bias in self-directed learning

Self-directed learning is a major part of individual knowledge formation. People often autonomously organize their own learning into "blocks": they practice a certain task for some continuous stretch of time, then switch to another task for another period of time, and so on. Yet current models of intrinsic motivation highlighting epistemic factors such as novelty, competence, and learning progress make various predictions about the extent to which learners block, as opposed to interleaving, their practice. In this study, we demonstrate that people tend to block in a multi-task setting where existing models of intrinsic motivation based on epistemic factors make ambiguous predictions. We show that while epistemic factors can partially explain blocking, a simple repetition bias substantially improves our ability to predict choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106764
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Repetition bias in self-directed learning

Michiko Sakaki, Alexandr Ten, Kou Murayama
Cognition
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Repetition bias in self-directed learning

Michiko Sakaki, Alexandr Ten, Kou Murayama
article en

Abstract

Self-directed learning is a major part of individual knowledge formation. People often autonomously organize their own learning into "blocks": they practice a certain task for some continuous stretch of time, then switch to another task for another period of time, and so on. Yet current models of intrinsic motivation highlighting epistemic factors such as novelty, competence, and learning progress make various predictions about the extent to which learners block, as opposed to interleaving, their practice. In this study, we demonstrate that people tend to block in a multi-task setting where existing models of intrinsic motivation based on epistemic factors make ambiguous predictions. We show that while epistemic factors can partially explain blocking, a simple repetition bias substantially improves our ability to predict choices.

CognitionVol. 279
Kochi University of Technology (JP), University of Tübingen (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Institute of Education Sciences
Quality education
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon