Bolus-only versus bolus plus continuous infusion hydromorphone for refractory cancer pain: a prospective, multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial

Refractory cancer pain (RCP) remains difficult to manage despite guideline-based therapy. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is increasingly used, yet the optimal administration mode remains unclear. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial, patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled between December 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022, and randomly assigned to either a bolus-only PCIA group (Group B) or a bolus plus continuous infusion group (Group BC). Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The primary endpoint was the pain relief rate at 72 h after PCIA initiation, defined as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in resting pain intensity from baseline. Non-inferiority was evaluated using the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of − 10%. A total of 226 patients were randomized. with 104 assigned to Group B and 111 to Group BC. Both groups showed significant reductions in resting NRS scores and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) NRS scores from T1 to T6 compared with baseline (all P < 0.05). At 72 h, the pain relief rate was 89.4% in Group B and 94.2% in Group BC. The between-group difference yielded a 90% CI of − 11.2% to 1.1%, which crossed the predefined non-inferiority margin. Therefore, non-inferiority of Group B compared with Group BC was not demonstrated. The incidence of PCIA-related adverse events was comparable between the two groups. Non-inferiority of bolus-only PCIA compared with bolus plus continuous infusion was not established. Nevertheless, both PCIA administration modes provided effective analgesia and demonstrated favorable safety profiles in patients with refractory cancer pain. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800020014. Registered 19 November 2018, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=32731

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11323-4
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bolus-only versus bolus plus continuous infusion hydromorphone for refractory cancer pain: a prospective, multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial

Zhe Yan, 田德民, Liyan Gong, Jin Yi et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Bolus-only versus bolus plus continuous infusion hydromorphone for refractory cancer pain: a prospective, multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial

Zhe Yan, 田德民, Liyan Gong, Jin Yi, Li Zhou, Yanbin Fu, Guanglun Xie, Wensheng Zhao, Zhiying Feng
article en

Abstract

Refractory cancer pain (RCP) remains difficult to manage despite guideline-based therapy. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is increasingly used, yet the optimal administration mode remains unclear. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial, patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled between December 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022, and randomly assigned to either a bolus-only PCIA group (Group B) or a bolus plus continuous infusion group (Group BC). Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The primary endpoint was the pain relief rate at 72 h after PCIA initiation, defined as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in resting pain intensity from baseline. Non-inferiority was evaluated using the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of − 10%. A total of 226 patients were randomized. with 104 assigned to Group B and 111 to Group BC. Both groups showed significant reductions in resting NRS scores and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) NRS scores from T1 to T6 compared with baseline (all P < 0.05). At 72 h, the pain relief rate was 89.4% in Group B and 94.2% in Group BC. The between-group difference yielded a 90% CI of − 11.2% to 1.1%, which crossed the predefined non-inferiority margin. Therefore, non-inferiority of Group B compared with Group BC was not demonstrated. The incidence of PCIA-related adverse events was comparable between the two groups. Non-inferiority of bolus-only PCIA compared with bolus plus continuous infusion was not established. Nevertheless, both PCIA administration modes provided effective analgesia and demonstrated favorable safety profiles in patients with refractory cancer pain. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800020014. Registered 19 November 2018, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=32731

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(11)
Zhengzhou University (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Weihai Municipal Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN), Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon