External Validation of Risk Scores for Pediatric Pneumonia

Background: Neither the Pneumonia Risk Score ( PRS ) nor the VALS-DANCE diagnostic tool has been externally validated using a reference standard specific for bacterial pneumonia. We used a previously published cohort of children with suspected bacterial pneumonia to externally validate these scores. Methods: Children attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments with suspected pneumonia had extensive standardized data collected that were provided to an expert panel to reach a consensus diagnosis. This diagnosis was used to externally validate both clinical scores. Proportions, point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, as appropriate, for the classifications and cutoffs recommended for PRS and VALS-Dance. Results: In a cohort of 236 children, the PRS classified 69 as low risk, 155 as moderate risk and 12 as high risk for “radiographic” pneumonia. Of these, 11/69 (15.9%), 44/155 (28.4%) and 5/12 (41.7%), respectively, had bacterial pneumonia, yielding a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.64 (95% CI 0.56–0.71). The PRS low-risk grouping yielded negative likelihood ratio (−LR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.24–0.88) and the high-risk grouping a positive LR (+LR) 2.10 (95% CI −0.23 to 4.42) for bacterial pneumonia. In a cohort of 94 children, the VALS-DANCE Step1 cutoff yielded +LR 2.97 (95% CI 1.52–4.08) and −LR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05–0.33) for distinguishing bacterial from viral pneumonia. In a cohort of 53 children, the VALS-DANCE Step2 cutoff yielded +LR 13.1 (95% CI 0.83–208.8) and −LR 0.65 (95% CI 0.51–0.84) for distinguishing typical from atypical bacterial pneumonia. Conclusions: The PRS may have limited utility in the emergency department in guiding clinicians as to whether children with suspected pneumonia need antibiotics. For children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia, the VALS-DANCE Step1 diagnostic tool may have some utility for ruling out, but little for confirming bacterial pneumonia. For those with bacterial pneumonia, VALS-DANCE Step2 has uncertain utility for confirming typical and little utility for diagnosing atypical pneumonia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0000000000005452
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External Validation of Risk Scores for Pediatric Pneumonia

Guanmin Chen, Jennifer Crotts, Kathy Boutis, Martin V Pusic et al.
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

External Validation of Risk Scores for Pediatric Pneumonia

Guanmin Chen, Jennifer Crotts, Kathy Boutis, Martin V Pusic, Joan L. Robinson, James D. Kellner, David Wayne Johnson, Sarah J. Curtis, Maala Bhatt, Richard van Wylick, Ravi Bhargava, FRCPC Tim Lynch, Valerie G. Kirk, Michael Weinstein, Martin Reed
article en

Abstract

Background: Neither the Pneumonia Risk Score ( PRS ) nor the VALS-DANCE diagnostic tool has been externally validated using a reference standard specific for bacterial pneumonia. We used a previously published cohort of children with suspected bacterial pneumonia to externally validate these scores. Methods: Children attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments with suspected pneumonia had extensive standardized data collected that were provided to an expert panel to reach a consensus diagnosis. This diagnosis was used to externally validate both clinical scores. Proportions, point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, as appropriate, for the classifications and cutoffs recommended for PRS and VALS-Dance. Results: In a cohort of 236 children, the PRS classified 69 as low risk, 155 as moderate risk and 12 as high risk for “radiographic” pneumonia. Of these, 11/69 (15.9%), 44/155 (28.4%) and 5/12 (41.7%), respectively, had bacterial pneumonia, yielding a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.64 (95% CI 0.56–0.71). The PRS low-risk grouping yielded negative likelihood ratio (−LR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.24–0.88) and the high-risk grouping a positive LR (+LR) 2.10 (95% CI −0.23 to 4.42) for bacterial pneumonia. In a cohort of 94 children, the VALS-DANCE Step1 cutoff yielded +LR 2.97 (95% CI 1.52–4.08) and −LR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05–0.33) for distinguishing bacterial from viral pneumonia. In a cohort of 53 children, the VALS-DANCE Step2 cutoff yielded +LR 13.1 (95% CI 0.83–208.8) and −LR 0.65 (95% CI 0.51–0.84) for distinguishing typical from atypical bacterial pneumonia. Conclusions: The PRS may have limited utility in the emergency department in guiding clinicians as to whether children with suspected pneumonia need antibiotics. For children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia, the VALS-DANCE Step1 diagnostic tool may have some utility for ruling out, but little for confirming bacterial pneumonia. For those with bacterial pneumonia, VALS-DANCE Step2 has uncertain utility for confirming typical and little utility for diagnosing atypical pneumonia.

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Western University (CA), Alberta Health Services (CA), Harvard University (US), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), South Health Campus (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon