Urgent versus scheduled resection in high-grade glioma: patient selection and healthcare utilization in a single-center cohort

Abstract Purpose Patients with high-grade glioma reach surgery during the initial, index hospitalization (urgent), or through scheduled/outpatient pathways. There is a paucity of literature examining what patients require expedited versus elective surgery. This single-center retrospective study describes complications, utilization, and survival by pathway. Methods Adults with WHO grade 3–4 gliomas undergoing primary resection (2021–2026) were classified as urgent (admitted without a planned resection date) or scheduled (discharged and readmitted for planned surgery, or managed exclusively as an outpatient). Primary outcomes were 30-day complications and days alive at home within 30 days of admission for resection (DAH-30). Secondary outcomes were progression free and overall survival. Survival was analyzed with propensity-score overlap weighting and Cox regression. Results Of 166 patients, 122 underwent urgent resection and 44 scheduled resections; 40 of 44 (91%) proceeded as planned. Urgent patients more often had midline shift (62% vs. 32%), less often seizure (15% vs. 39%), and lower Karnofsky scores (70 vs. 80); all p ≤ 0.002. They had longer index hospitalizations (median 8 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and fewer days at home (median 15 vs. 27; adjusted difference − 8.9 days, 95% CI − 12.9 to − 4.8). Complication rates (36% vs. 30%; adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.52–2.62) and overall survival (median 15.4 vs. 19.0 months, p = 0.758) did not differ detectably. Conclusions Scheduled resection identified a distinct population, recognizable at initial evaluation by preserved performance status and the absence of midline shift. These patients spent more days at home and required shorter hospitalizations; no harm signal was observed. These data suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with newly diagnosed presumed high grade gliomas can be managed effectively in an expedited, outpatient basis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05841-8
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urgent versus scheduled resection in high-grade glioma: patient selection and healthcare utilization in a single-center cohort

Matthew J. Shepard, Rodney E. Wegner, Alexander C. Whiting, Praveer S. Vyas et al.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Urgent versus scheduled resection in high-grade glioma: patient selection and healthcare utilization in a single-center cohort

Matthew J. Shepard, Rodney E. Wegner, Alexander C. Whiting, Praveer S. Vyas, Abigail Mckenna, Trent Kite, Danny A. Mahmoudi, Alexander Yu, Sami Shaikh, John Herbst, Stephen Karlovits, Eric Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Patients with high-grade glioma reach surgery during the initial, index hospitalization (urgent), or through scheduled/outpatient pathways. There is a paucity of literature examining what patients require expedited versus elective surgery. This single-center retrospective study describes complications, utilization, and survival by pathway. Methods Adults with WHO grade 3–4 gliomas undergoing primary resection (2021–2026) were classified as urgent (admitted without a planned resection date) or scheduled (discharged and readmitted for planned surgery, or managed exclusively as an outpatient). Primary outcomes were 30-day complications and days alive at home within 30 days of admission for resection (DAH-30). Secondary outcomes were progression free and overall survival. Survival was analyzed with propensity-score overlap weighting and Cox regression. Results Of 166 patients, 122 underwent urgent resection and 44 scheduled resections; 40 of 44 (91%) proceeded as planned. Urgent patients more often had midline shift (62% vs. 32%), less often seizure (15% vs. 39%), and lower Karnofsky scores (70 vs. 80); all p ≤ 0.002. They had longer index hospitalizations (median 8 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and fewer days at home (median 15 vs. 27; adjusted difference − 8.9 days, 95% CI − 12.9 to − 4.8). Complication rates (36% vs. 30%; adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.52–2.62) and overall survival (median 15.4 vs. 19.0 months, p = 0.758) did not differ detectably. Conclusions Scheduled resection identified a distinct population, recognizable at initial evaluation by preserved performance status and the absence of midline shift. These patients spent more days at home and required shorter hospitalizations; no harm signal was observed. These data suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with newly diagnosed presumed high grade gliomas can be managed effectively in an expedited, outpatient basis.

Journal of Neuro-OncologyVol. 180(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon