Nonprofit Fiscal Sponsorship: How Capacity Shapes Coordination and Cooperation

Fiscal sponsorship is a growing mode of nonprofit program delivery, yet theory treats it as a uniform interorganizational relationship. Drawing on Castañer and Oliveira’s distinction between coordination and cooperation, we argue that sponsorship models occupy different positions on a coordination–cooperation continuum, and these positions demand different capacities. We assemble a novel dataset linking the Fiscal Sponsor Directory to 2022 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 filings and estimate count and logistic regression models. Results show that organizational maturity predicts consolidation into fewer models without a contraction of services, while revenue scale predicts deeper service provision without a wider model portfolio. Arts sponsors are less likely to operate the Direct Project model, indicating that field membership rather than capacity distinguishes cooperators. Conventional capacity slack- and diversification-based measures do not predict continuum position. Overall, fiscal sponsorship supports multiple stable organizational forms, and funders and policymakers should consider sponsor capacity relative to the model(s) they operate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640261495477
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprofit Fiscal Sponsorship: How Capacity Shapes Coordination and Cooperation

Kate Albrecht, Deborah A. Carroll, Ezequiel Gaytan-Neri
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Nonprofit Fiscal Sponsorship: How Capacity Shapes Coordination and Cooperation

Kate Albrecht, Deborah A. Carroll, Ezequiel Gaytan-Neri
article en

Abstract

Fiscal sponsorship is a growing mode of nonprofit program delivery, yet theory treats it as a uniform interorganizational relationship. Drawing on Castañer and Oliveira’s distinction between coordination and cooperation, we argue that sponsorship models occupy different positions on a coordination–cooperation continuum, and these positions demand different capacities. We assemble a novel dataset linking the Fiscal Sponsor Directory to 2022 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 filings and estimate count and logistic regression models. Results show that organizational maturity predicts consolidation into fewer models without a contraction of services, while revenue scale predicts deeper service provision without a wider model portfolio. Arts sponsors are less likely to operate the Direct Project model, indicating that field membership rather than capacity distinguishes cooperators. Conventional capacity slack- and diversification-based measures do not predict continuum position. Overall, fiscal sponsorship supports multiple stable organizational forms, and funders and policymakers should consider sponsor capacity relative to the model(s) they operate.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Government of Russia (RU), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Nonprofit Fiscal Sponsorship: How Capacity Shapes Coordination and Cooperation — Kate Albrecht, Deborah A. Carroll, et al. · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS