Guidelines for Safe Infusion Practices in Emergency and Acute Care Settings: Society of Acute Care Trauma and Emergency Medicine Delphi Consensus Statement

Abstract Background: Infusion therapy forms an integral part of emergency/acute care medicine, and there continue to be many challenges, such as infusion errors, catheter-related complications, infections, medication errors, and occupational health concerns, in the delivery of safe intravenous therapy. Hence, this Society for Acute Care Trauma and Emergency Medicine guideline sought to provide evidence-based recommendations for safe infusion practices in acute emergency situations. Methodology: A systematic Delphi consensus process was undertaken. The operational definitions for safe infusion practice were defined by the steering committee. Evidence was obtained from searches conducted within PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infusion Nurses Society, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, Joint Commission and other sources. The strength of recommendation was scored using a five-point Likert scale. Results: One hundred and one recommendations were made within 11 categories, which include training and technology, hand hygiene, difficult venous access, peripheral venous catheter insertion and management, infusion processes, infusion technology, prevention of drug administration errors, waste management, training methods and telemedicine/arteficial intelligence. Sixty-three recommendations had reached a high degree of consensus, 24 reached a medium degree of consensus and 14 were considered weak. A total of 55 recommendations reached consensus in the first iteration of the Delphi process, and 46 needed modification/re-evaluation. The scores of agreement were between 72.4% and 97.2%. Conclusions: The recommendations developed by the current study can serve as a systematic and practical approach to ensure infusion safety in the setting of emergency and acute care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMO journal
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jnmo.jnmo_66_26
Primary Topic
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for Safe Infusion Practices in Emergency and Acute Care Settings: Society of Acute Care Trauma and Emergency Medicine Delphi Consensus Statement

Tanmay Tiwari, Somnath Longani, Utsav Anand Mani, Shiv S. Tripathi et al.
NMO journal
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
article

Guidelines for Safe Infusion Practices in Emergency and Acute Care Settings: Society of Acute Care Trauma and Emergency Medicine Delphi Consensus Statement

Tanmay Tiwari, Somnath Longani, Utsav Anand Mani, Shiv S. Tripathi, Abhay Raj Yadav, Arun Kumar Pandey, Ashish Bhalla, Pravin Kumar Das, Ratna Kumar Natta, Nayan Sriramula, Haider Abbas, Dr. Anjani Priya Vemula, Avinash Agrawal, Lokendra Gupta, Yash Javeri, Pushpraj Singh, Subhankar Paul, Tarun Sharma, Vimala Venkatesh, Dontula Madhu Kiran, Om Prakash Sanjeev, Rajeshwari Sanjay Vhora, Jobin Jose Maprani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Infusion therapy forms an integral part of emergency/acute care medicine, and there continue to be many challenges, such as infusion errors, catheter-related complications, infections, medication errors, and occupational health concerns, in the delivery of safe intravenous therapy. Hence, this Society for Acute Care Trauma and Emergency Medicine guideline sought to provide evidence-based recommendations for safe infusion practices in acute emergency situations. Methodology: A systematic Delphi consensus process was undertaken. The operational definitions for safe infusion practice were defined by the steering committee. Evidence was obtained from searches conducted within PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infusion Nurses Society, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, Joint Commission and other sources. The strength of recommendation was scored using a five-point Likert scale. Results: One hundred and one recommendations were made within 11 categories, which include training and technology, hand hygiene, difficult venous access, peripheral venous catheter insertion and management, infusion processes, infusion technology, prevention of drug administration errors, waste management, training methods and telemedicine/arteficial intelligence. Sixty-three recommendations had reached a high degree of consensus, 24 reached a medium degree of consensus and 14 were considered weak. A total of 55 recommendations reached consensus in the first iteration of the Delphi process, and 46 needed modification/re-evaluation. The scores of agreement were between 72.4% and 97.2%. Conclusions: The recommendations developed by the current study can serve as a systematic and practical approach to ensure infusion safety in the setting of emergency and acute care.

NMO journal
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Amala Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), B. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital (IN), CARE Hospitals (IN), King George's Medical University (IN), M.V. Hospital and Research Centre (IN), SRM University, Andhra Pradesh (IN), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (IN), Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Yashoda Hospital (IN), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN), Career Institute Of Medical & Dental Sciences and Hospital (IN), Medicover Hospitals (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur (IN), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon