How IT Architecture Flexibility and Governance Decentralization Shape Digital Transformation Capabilities

Modular systems theory and the dynamic capabilities perspective suggest that modularity in the IT function, both architectural and organizational, shapes a firm’s digital transformation capabilities (DTCs), yet the joint effect of these two organizational-design choices has not been tested. Drawing on survey data from 188 U.S. firms and partial least squares structural equation modeling, this study examines how IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralization, separately and jointly, influence digital sensing, digital seizing, and digital transforming. Findings suggest that IT architecture flexibility has strong positive effects on all three dimensions, while IT governance decentralization positively affects sensing and seizing but not transforming. Crucially, the interaction between flexibility and decentralization negatively moderates the relationships with sensing and seizing, indicating that technical and organizational modularity can substitute rather than complement. The study contributes a nine-micro-foundation operationalization of DTCs and challenges the prevailing complementarity assumption between architectural and governance modularity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-026-10832-1
Primary Topic
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How IT Architecture Flexibility and Governance Decentralization Shape Digital Transformation Capabilities

Henri Hussinki, Patrick Mikalef, Andreas Olsen
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
article

How IT Architecture Flexibility and Governance Decentralization Shape Digital Transformation Capabilities

Henri Hussinki, Patrick Mikalef, Andreas Olsen
article en

Abstract

Modular systems theory and the dynamic capabilities perspective suggest that modularity in the IT function, both architectural and organizational, shapes a firm’s digital transformation capabilities (DTCs), yet the joint effect of these two organizational-design choices has not been tested. Drawing on survey data from 188 U.S. firms and partial least squares structural equation modeling, this study examines how IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralization, separately and jointly, influence digital sensing, digital seizing, and digital transforming. Findings suggest that IT architecture flexibility has strong positive effects on all three dimensions, while IT governance decentralization positively affects sensing and seizing but not transforming. Crucially, the interaction between flexibility and decentralization negatively moderates the relationships with sensing and seizing, indicating that technical and organizational modularity can substitute rather than complement. The study contributes a nine-micro-foundation operationalization of DTCs and challenges the prevailing complementarity assumption between architectural and governance modularity.

Information Systems Frontiers
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How IT Architecture Flexibility and Governance Decentralization Shape Digital Transformation Capabilities — Henri Hussinki, Patrick Mikalef, et al. · Information Systems Frontiers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS