A Pilot Group Visit Series to Empower Opportunity Youth: Building Skills for Managing Pain, Anxiety, and Distress

Background/Objective: Adolescents experience stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain at rates comparable to adults. Opportunity youth are a unique subset of adolescents/young adults with a higher risk of chronic pain and mental health comorbidities. Group Medical Visits (GMVs) for adults are a well-established model supporting whole-person care for chronic pain and co-incident mental health challenges. Research on GMVs among adolescents is limited. This program evaluation explores the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of a chronic pain GMV curriculum adapted for opportunity youth at a residential employment-readiness center. Preliminary signals of program impact were explored as a secondary objective of the study. Methods: After completing a chronic pain GMV training program, two pediatricians adapted and piloted the curriculum for opportunity youth through an 8-week Group Visit Series (GVS) offering integrative and lifestyle-based approaches to mental health, stress, and chronic pain. This was a single-site, uncontrolled, mixed-methods pilot program evaluation. Attendance was recorded as a measure of feasibility. A weekly progress sheet captured pre-/post-visit participant feedback, and semi-structured interviews (n = 6), conducted one month post-GVS, were examined using rapid analysis to explore acceptability. Sustainability was observed by program continuation beyond the pilot. Exploratory participant-reported outcomes were collected through PROMIS-29 (n = 6), PROMIS Positive Affect (n = 5), and Patient Global Impression of Change (n = 6). Results: Fourteen participants enrolled, with nine completing ≥3 visits. Weekly progress sheets demonstrated intra-visit changes from pain, fatigue, and concern to calm. Interview analysis yielded concepts of appreciation for skills learned and the group experience. Sustainability was observed. Six of seven PROMIS-29 domains showed positive signals of improvement, with 6/6 (100%) of respondents meeting a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) threshold for depression and 5/6 (83%) for anxiety. PROMIS-Positive Affect and Patient Global Impression of Change showed positive trends at visit 8. Conclusions: This chronic pain and mental health GVS for opportunity youth was found to be feasible, acceptable, and sustainable. Positive trends in participant-reported depression and anxiety scores were also observed. Larger studies beyond program evaluation are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213567
Primary Topic
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pilot Group Visit Series to Empower Opportunity Youth: Building Skills for Managing Pain, Anxiety, and Distress

Catherine Justice, Tegan Jemma Reeves, Jadyn E. Knox, Susan Haddow et al.
Healthcare
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
article

A Pilot Group Visit Series to Empower Opportunity Youth: Building Skills for Managing Pain, Anxiety, and Distress

Catherine Justice, Tegan Jemma Reeves, Jadyn E. Knox, Susan Haddow, Peter B. Scal, Katherine Shafto, Ammani Prasad, Jacinta Rebang, Kara Lawrence
article en

Abstract

Background/Objective: Adolescents experience stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain at rates comparable to adults. Opportunity youth are a unique subset of adolescents/young adults with a higher risk of chronic pain and mental health comorbidities. Group Medical Visits (GMVs) for adults are a well-established model supporting whole-person care for chronic pain and co-incident mental health challenges. Research on GMVs among adolescents is limited. This program evaluation explores the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of a chronic pain GMV curriculum adapted for opportunity youth at a residential employment-readiness center. Preliminary signals of program impact were explored as a secondary objective of the study. Methods: After completing a chronic pain GMV training program, two pediatricians adapted and piloted the curriculum for opportunity youth through an 8-week Group Visit Series (GVS) offering integrative and lifestyle-based approaches to mental health, stress, and chronic pain. This was a single-site, uncontrolled, mixed-methods pilot program evaluation. Attendance was recorded as a measure of feasibility. A weekly progress sheet captured pre-/post-visit participant feedback, and semi-structured interviews (n = 6), conducted one month post-GVS, were examined using rapid analysis to explore acceptability. Sustainability was observed by program continuation beyond the pilot. Exploratory participant-reported outcomes were collected through PROMIS-29 (n = 6), PROMIS Positive Affect (n = 5), and Patient Global Impression of Change (n = 6). Results: Fourteen participants enrolled, with nine completing ≥3 visits. Weekly progress sheets demonstrated intra-visit changes from pain, fatigue, and concern to calm. Interview analysis yielded concepts of appreciation for skills learned and the group experience. Sustainability was observed. Six of seven PROMIS-29 domains showed positive signals of improvement, with 6/6 (100%) of respondents meeting a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) threshold for depression and 5/6 (83%) for anxiety. PROMIS-Positive Affect and Patient Global Impression of Change showed positive trends at visit 8. Conclusions: This chronic pain and mental health GVS for opportunity youth was found to be feasible, acceptable, and sustainable. Positive trends in participant-reported depression and anxiety scores were also observed. Larger studies beyond program evaluation are needed to confirm these results.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
University of Minnesota (US), Bakken Museum (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon