Tight Glycemic Control in a Vulnerable Population: Diabetes Treatment Patterns in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Background: Diabetes management in patients with hematologic malignancies is challenging because of advanced age, multimorbidity, and cancer-related therapies. However, real-world evidence regarding glycemic control in this population remains limited. We aimed to evaluate glycemic control, glucose-lowering treatment patterns, and factors associated with tight glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and hematologic malignancies. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 86 adults treated at a tertiary university hematology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were extracted from medical records. Low measured glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was defined as HbA1c <6.5%. Associated factors were examined using exploratory multivariable logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 75.0 ± 11.6 years; 48 patients (55.8%) were men. Among the 80 patients with available HbA1c measurements, the median HbA1c was 6.6% (interquartile range 6.0–7.2), and 37 (46.3%) had HbA1c <6.5%. Exploratory regression analyses suggested higher odds of HbA1c <6.5% with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002–1.055; p = 0.035) and lower odds with diabetic vascular complications (adjusted OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09–0.99; p = 0.048). At the alternative HbA1c threshold of <7.0%, corticosteroid exposure was associated with lower odds (adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13–0.98; p = 0.046). Fifteen patients (18.8%) had HbA1c <6.5% while receiving insulin and/or a sulfonylurea. Conclusions: Low HbA1c values were common in this cohort, including among patients receiving insulin and/or sulfonylureas. These findings describe low measured HbA1c and associated treatment patterns but do not establish unnecessarily intensive treatment, clinical inappropriateness, hypoglycemia, or treatment-related harm. Prospective studies incorporating individualized treatment targets and documented hypoglycemia are needed to clarify their clinical significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14112410
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tight Glycemic Control in a Vulnerable Population: Diabetes Treatment Patterns in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Theocharis Koufakis, Eleni Gavriilaki, Panagiotis Kalmoukos, Athanasios Gatsis et al.
Biomedicines
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Tight Glycemic Control in a Vulnerable Population: Diabetes Treatment Patterns in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Theocharis Koufakis, Eleni Gavriilaki, Panagiotis Kalmoukos, Athanasios Gatsis, Sofia Vakalopoulou, Dimitrios Patoulias, Nikolaos Papoutsidakis, Ioannis Eftychidis, Nikolaos Kotsiou, Ευδοκία Μανδαλά, Elisavet Christidou, Thomas Achladas, Maria Zarfeiadou, Michael Doumas, Iraklis Leonidis
article en

Abstract

Background: Diabetes management in patients with hematologic malignancies is challenging because of advanced age, multimorbidity, and cancer-related therapies. However, real-world evidence regarding glycemic control in this population remains limited. We aimed to evaluate glycemic control, glucose-lowering treatment patterns, and factors associated with tight glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and hematologic malignancies. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 86 adults treated at a tertiary university hematology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were extracted from medical records. Low measured glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was defined as HbA1c <6.5%. Associated factors were examined using exploratory multivariable logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 75.0 ± 11.6 years; 48 patients (55.8%) were men. Among the 80 patients with available HbA1c measurements, the median HbA1c was 6.6% (interquartile range 6.0–7.2), and 37 (46.3%) had HbA1c <6.5%. Exploratory regression analyses suggested higher odds of HbA1c <6.5% with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002–1.055; p = 0.035) and lower odds with diabetic vascular complications (adjusted OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09–0.99; p = 0.048). At the alternative HbA1c threshold of <7.0%, corticosteroid exposure was associated with lower odds (adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13–0.98; p = 0.046). Fifteen patients (18.8%) had HbA1c <6.5% while receiving insulin and/or a sulfonylurea. Conclusions: Low HbA1c values were common in this cohort, including among patients receiving insulin and/or sulfonylureas. These findings describe low measured HbA1c and associated treatment patterns but do not establish unnecessarily intensive treatment, clinical inappropriateness, hypoglycemia, or treatment-related harm. Prospective studies incorporating individualized treatment targets and documented hypoglycemia are needed to clarify their clinical significance.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(11)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Ippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki (GR), Hippocration General Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon