Translation and psychometric properties of the Danish version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) among patients undergoing PCI

Abstract Purpose The Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a 35-item instrument developed for patients with myocardial infarction, but has not yet been evaluated in a Danish setting. The aim of this study was to translate and assess the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the MIDAS scale in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina pectoris receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This cross-sectional psychometric evaluation used two-month follow-up data from adult patients enrolled in the CONCARD PCI study. MIDAS was translated, culturally adapted, and pretested before use. Further questionnaires included assessment of angina (SAQ-7). symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) and physical and mental health status (RAND-12) linked with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics collected at baseline. Construct validity was evaluated through CFA and hypotheses testing, including known-groups analyses and correlations with SAQ-7, HADS, and RAND-12. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results A total of 1447 patients were included: the median age was 67 years (IQR 57–74), and 22% were women. The CFA, based on 1051 participants with complete MIDAS data, did not adequately support the original seven-factor structure (χ²(539) = 4409, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.083; TLI = 0.833; CFI = 0.849). Standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.48 to 0.88. Three of six predefined known-groups hypotheses were supported (50%). Correlations for the expected convergent relationships were moderate to high, and domain-level Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.93. Conclusion The findings generally supported convergent validity and domain-level internal consistency, whereas the known-groups analyses provided limited support, and the original seven-factor structure was not adequately supported.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01233-8
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation and psychometric properties of the Danish version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) among patients undergoing PCI

Britt Borregaard, David R. Thompson, Charlotte Helmark, Sofie Moesgaard Bruvik et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Translation and psychometric properties of the Danish version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) among patients undergoing PCI

Britt Borregaard, David R. Thompson, Charlotte Helmark, Sofie Moesgaard Bruvik, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Pernille Palm, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Tone M. Norekvål, Ann Dorthe Zwisler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a 35-item instrument developed for patients with myocardial infarction, but has not yet been evaluated in a Danish setting. The aim of this study was to translate and assess the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the MIDAS scale in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina pectoris receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This cross-sectional psychometric evaluation used two-month follow-up data from adult patients enrolled in the CONCARD PCI study. MIDAS was translated, culturally adapted, and pretested before use. Further questionnaires included assessment of angina (SAQ-7). symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) and physical and mental health status (RAND-12) linked with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics collected at baseline. Construct validity was evaluated through CFA and hypotheses testing, including known-groups analyses and correlations with SAQ-7, HADS, and RAND-12. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results A total of 1447 patients were included: the median age was 67 years (IQR 57–74), and 22% were women. The CFA, based on 1051 participants with complete MIDAS data, did not adequately support the original seven-factor structure (χ²(539) = 4409, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.083; TLI = 0.833; CFI = 0.849). Standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.48 to 0.88. Three of six predefined known-groups hypotheses were supported (50%). Correlations for the expected convergent relationships were moderate to high, and domain-level Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.93. Conclusion The findings generally supported convergent validity and domain-level internal consistency, whereas the known-groups analyses provided limited support, and the original seven-factor structure was not adequately supported.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon