How Indigenous Socio-Cultural Systems Resist, Accept, or Direct Ecological Transformation: A Research Agenda

Abstract Anthropogenic ecological transformations are challenging conventional environmental management paradigms, as maintaining historical ecological structures and functions becomes increasingly untenable. The resist–accept–direct (RAD) framework offers a strategic tool to navigate these shifts. However, as a product of the dominant socio-cultural system, the RAD framework risks perpetuating the same patterns of thinking that have contributed to unsustainable social-ecological dynamics. Indigenous socio-cultural systems, considered here through the lens of long-term coevolution with their environments, offer valuable empirical models for adaptive responses to environmental change. Such Indigenous socio-cultural responses, grounded in narratives, governance institutions, value systems, and other cultural elements collectively referred to as Indigenous Knowledge (IK), hold relevance for addressing today’s intertwined environmental and social challenges. We provide a targeted review of existing literature at the intersection of IK and the RAD framework, along with a broader conceptual overview of relevant insights across related fields. These reveal contrasting assumptions about Indigenous responses to environmental change, such as consistently resisting to preserve cultural fidelity or uniformly accepting, reflecting deeper cultural, temporal, and ecological complexity. We propose a structured research agenda to investigate Indigenous socio-cultural responses to environmental change through empirical research, theoretical synthesis, hypothesis development, and practical application. This agenda is grounded in comprehensive collaboration, emphasizing shared power and integrating both emic and etic perspectives throughout all stages of research and implementation. By bridging the adaptive dynamics of coevolved social-ecological systems and mainstream management strategies, an IK–RAD framework could enhance the efficacy of responses to global environmental change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Ecology
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-026-00805-y
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Indigenous Socio-Cultural Systems Resist, Accept, or Direct Ecological Transformation: A Research Agenda

Brian W. Miller, Gregor W. Schuurman, Tony W. Ciocco, Stefan Tangen
Human Ecology
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
article

How Indigenous Socio-Cultural Systems Resist, Accept, or Direct Ecological Transformation: A Research Agenda

Brian W. Miller, Gregor W. Schuurman, Tony W. Ciocco, Stefan Tangen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anthropogenic ecological transformations are challenging conventional environmental management paradigms, as maintaining historical ecological structures and functions becomes increasingly untenable. The resist–accept–direct (RAD) framework offers a strategic tool to navigate these shifts. However, as a product of the dominant socio-cultural system, the RAD framework risks perpetuating the same patterns of thinking that have contributed to unsustainable social-ecological dynamics. Indigenous socio-cultural systems, considered here through the lens of long-term coevolution with their environments, offer valuable empirical models for adaptive responses to environmental change. Such Indigenous socio-cultural responses, grounded in narratives, governance institutions, value systems, and other cultural elements collectively referred to as Indigenous Knowledge (IK), hold relevance for addressing today’s intertwined environmental and social challenges. We provide a targeted review of existing literature at the intersection of IK and the RAD framework, along with a broader conceptual overview of relevant insights across related fields. These reveal contrasting assumptions about Indigenous responses to environmental change, such as consistently resisting to preserve cultural fidelity or uniformly accepting, reflecting deeper cultural, temporal, and ecological complexity. We propose a structured research agenda to investigate Indigenous socio-cultural responses to environmental change through empirical research, theoretical synthesis, hypothesis development, and practical application. This agenda is grounded in comprehensive collaboration, emphasizing shared power and integrating both emic and etic perspectives throughout all stages of research and implementation. By bridging the adaptive dynamics of coevolved social-ecological systems and mainstream management strategies, an IK–RAD framework could enhance the efficacy of responses to global environmental change.

Human EcologyVol. 55(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How Indigenous Socio-Cultural Systems Resist, Accept, or Direct Ecological Transformation: A Research Agenda — Brian W. Miller, Gregor W. Schuurman, et al. · Human Ecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS