In search of lost time. Codification and recodification of labour law in Poland

Poland is among the European countries that have codified labour law. The Labour Code, enacted during the communist period (1974), although amended more than 100 times, has remained in force to this day. Despite the unique circumstances of its adoption, the Polish Labour Code is of interest in the debate over the merits and drawbacks of codification. The history of the Code – particularly since 1989 – also offers an important lesson on the factors that can either facilitate or hinder codification (recodification), including the nature and composition of the teams (committees) responsible for drafting the legislation. The author argues that the failure of the two codification committees (2002–2006 and 2016–2018) stemmed from a lack of broad social consensus on the proposed solutions, which would have significantly altered the labour law architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Labour Law Journal
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525261497325
Primary Topic
Polish Legal and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In search of lost time. Codification and recodification of labour law in Poland

Łukasz Pisarczyk
European Labour Law Journal
Polish Legal and Social Issues
article

In search of lost time. Codification and recodification of labour law in Poland

Łukasz Pisarczyk
article en

Abstract

Poland is among the European countries that have codified labour law. The Labour Code, enacted during the communist period (1974), although amended more than 100 times, has remained in force to this day. Despite the unique circumstances of its adoption, the Polish Labour Code is of interest in the debate over the merits and drawbacks of codification. The history of the Code – particularly since 1989 – also offers an important lesson on the factors that can either facilitate or hinder codification (recodification), including the nature and composition of the teams (committees) responsible for drafting the legislation. The author argues that the failure of the two codification committees (2002–2006 and 2016–2018) stemmed from a lack of broad social consensus on the proposed solutions, which would have significantly altered the labour law architecture.

European Labour Law Journal
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Polish Legal and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
In search of lost time. Codification and recodification of labour law in Poland — Łukasz Pisarczyk · European Labour Law Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS