Advances in ecological engineering and low-carbon products in designing of coastal structures

With the increasing threats posed by global climate change, artificial coastal structures remain essential to mitigate coastal erosion and flood risks in many regions worldwide. However, these structures are often criticized for introducing non-native materials that disrupt habitats and support lower biodiversity than natural rocks. Over the past three decades, eco-engineering has emerged as a solution to mitigate these impacts while maintaining their protective function. This study analyzes field and laboratory tests in the literature to identify advances in ecological engineering and low-carbon materials for the design of ecologically enhanced coastal structures. Key interventions include increasing surface complexity and heterogeneity of artificial substrates, evaluating the suitability of substrate types for biodiversity enhancement, and developing sustainable bio-enhancing concrete blends. Research highlights that incorporating surface roughness at scales from millimeters to decimeters, coupled with appropriate material selection can significantly enhance biodiversity while maintaining engineering performance. Examples of cost-effective habitat enhancement solutions include the BIOBLOCK unit ($2500 per unit), drill-core pools (€60 per pool), and artificial rock pools (€38 per pool). Concrete, especially with low-binder cements like slag cements (CEM III/B), is a suitable alternative when natural rock is unavailable. In this paper, studies are selected based on their relevance to coastal engineering practices, highlighting areas where further research is needed and offering recommendations to overcome barriers to the effective implementation and broader adoption of more sustainable and multifunctional coastal defences. Challenges include strengthening the evidence on achievable enhancements, clarifying cost-benefit analyzes, and improving data presentation for decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.108184
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in ecological engineering and low-carbon products in designing of coastal structures

M. Esther Gómez-Martín, Mireille Escudero, Josep R. Medina, Jorge Molines
Ecological Engineering
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
article

Advances in ecological engineering and low-carbon products in designing of coastal structures

M. Esther Gómez-Martín, Mireille Escudero, Josep R. Medina, Jorge Molines
article en

Abstract

With the increasing threats posed by global climate change, artificial coastal structures remain essential to mitigate coastal erosion and flood risks in many regions worldwide. However, these structures are often criticized for introducing non-native materials that disrupt habitats and support lower biodiversity than natural rocks. Over the past three decades, eco-engineering has emerged as a solution to mitigate these impacts while maintaining their protective function. This study analyzes field and laboratory tests in the literature to identify advances in ecological engineering and low-carbon materials for the design of ecologically enhanced coastal structures. Key interventions include increasing surface complexity and heterogeneity of artificial substrates, evaluating the suitability of substrate types for biodiversity enhancement, and developing sustainable bio-enhancing concrete blends. Research highlights that incorporating surface roughness at scales from millimeters to decimeters, coupled with appropriate material selection can significantly enhance biodiversity while maintaining engineering performance. Examples of cost-effective habitat enhancement solutions include the BIOBLOCK unit ($2500 per unit), drill-core pools (€60 per pool), and artificial rock pools (€38 per pool). Concrete, especially with low-binder cements like slag cements (CEM III/B), is a suitable alternative when natural rock is unavailable. In this paper, studies are selected based on their relevance to coastal engineering practices, highlighting areas where further research is needed and offering recommendations to overcome barriers to the effective implementation and broader adoption of more sustainable and multifunctional coastal defences. Challenges include strengthening the evidence on achievable enhancements, clarifying cost-benefit analyzes, and improving data presentation for decision-making.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 235
Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon