Temporal changes in white and Asian Americans’ intergroup behavior across the pandemic

Abstract Prior work has shown that when macro-level events threaten a group’s status, discriminatory behavior increases, but we know less about when such threats elicit ingroup favoritism versus outgroup prejudice. We argue that the nature of discrimination depends, in part, on whether people are responding to a threat during a period of higher or lower levels of societal strain. We test this with identical experiments run at two time points: one during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (a period of high ambient threat) and one post-pandemic (lower ambient threat). We primed participants with threatening information and then measured White and Asian Americans’ prosocial behavior toward ingroup versus outgroup targets. We find that the same threat prime elicits White Americans’ outgroup prejudice under high ambient threat, but their behavior shifted toward ingroup favoritism under low threat context. Asian Americans, on the other hand, responded to threat primes with increased generosity toward outgroups, even when the imminent threat of COVID-19 had faded. These results show that discrimination is context-contingent, clarifying when threat cues escalate hostility beyond mere ingroup preference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Problems
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spag074
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal changes in white and Asian Americans’ intergroup behavior across the pandemic

Justine Eatenson Tinkler, Jun Zhao, Kristen Clayton
Social Problems
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Temporal changes in white and Asian Americans’ intergroup behavior across the pandemic

Justine Eatenson Tinkler, Jun Zhao, Kristen Clayton
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prior work has shown that when macro-level events threaten a group’s status, discriminatory behavior increases, but we know less about when such threats elicit ingroup favoritism versus outgroup prejudice. We argue that the nature of discrimination depends, in part, on whether people are responding to a threat during a period of higher or lower levels of societal strain. We test this with identical experiments run at two time points: one during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (a period of high ambient threat) and one post-pandemic (lower ambient threat). We primed participants with threatening information and then measured White and Asian Americans’ prosocial behavior toward ingroup versus outgroup targets. We find that the same threat prime elicits White Americans’ outgroup prejudice under high ambient threat, but their behavior shifted toward ingroup favoritism under low threat context. Asian Americans, on the other hand, responded to threat primes with increased generosity toward outgroups, even when the imminent threat of COVID-19 had faded. These results show that discrimination is context-contingent, clarifying when threat cues escalate hostility beyond mere ingroup preference.

Social Problems
University of South Carolina (US), University of Georgia (US), Friends United (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon